Is the planned messenger monitoring constitutional? – Diepresse.com
As a « national Trojan », monitoring Messenger services has already had a long political past, now a current draft law is again causing criticism.
WhatsApp, Signal or Telegram: End-to-end-encrypted intelligence services, which also use so-called « endangers ». But if you are suspected of acting terroristically or constitutional, whose messenger data should be able to be monitored in the future.
What distinguishes the Messenger monitoring currently proposed by the Federal Government from National Trojan? And is targeted monitoring only technically possible from Messenger services?
Daniel Bischof From the domestic policy department of the « press » and tech editor Barbara Steinbrenner In this episode, explain why the current draft law continues to criticize data protection organizations and why one does not (yet) agree within the coalition.
Guest: Daniel Bischof, « The Press »; Barbara Steinbrenner, « The Press »
Moderation: Christine Mayrhofer
Cut: AudioFunnel/Dominik Lanterdinger
More on the topic:
You hear « what is important » here, the news podcast of the Austrian daily newspaper « Die Presse » for curious ears who want to know more than the headline.
Daily from Monday to Friday, 5 p.m.
All other podcast sequences can be found at https://www.diepresse.com/podcast and on YouTube.
Write us! We look forward to feedback and criticism at
