In the State Duma, they argued who honors the Soviet heritage
The discussion about the return of the name of Joseph Stalin to the public space reached the State Duma, having received an unexpected sound there. At the plenary meeting on May 22, Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin called on colleagues from the Communist Party to appreciate the care that the Russian authorities show in relation to the Soviet past, and also scolded the Communists for the fact that the Communists once tried to forget the individual pages of the history of the history.
The historical discussion began when discussing the bill on the content of cultural heritage objects, which the State Duma considered in the final, third reading. He introduces a simplified procedure for conducting work in relation to “elements that are not a subject of protection”, explained the chairman of the Committee on Culture Olga Kazakov (United Russia, EP). These include the repair of systems of electro-, gas, water and heat supply, elevators, wall coatings and other things. This will eliminate the “excess requirements”, but to observe the “proper degree of protection”, added Ms. Kazakova.
The Communists did not reassure the explanations of the head of the relevant committee. “Where does such confidence come from that the placement of external structures on the facades of the object will not affect the appearance of the object?” -Vyacheslav Markhaev asked, adding that the Communist Party of the Communist Party does not see the justification of the cost of reducing expenses in the bill, but he sees the threat of objects due to the simplification of their content: “The threat, including objects of the Soviet era, which the Russian oligarch is mixed by.”
In response, Olga Kazakova referred to the requests of security subjects, which « repeatedly raised the question that the current system needed significant refinement, since it often contains excessive and duplicate norms. » And the speaker Vyacheslav Volodin (EP), having heard the arguments of the Communists, “for the purity of relations” decided to affect the ideological aspect.
According to him, the objects of the Soviet period are protected – monuments to Vladimir Lenin are in all regions, while the objects of the heritage of tsarist Russia were not protected at one time. And the careful attitude of modern power to the Soviet period contrasts with the attitude of those who stood at the head of the Soviet state, emphasized Mr. Volodin. “Where are the monuments to Stalin, who demolished them? – he asked and he himself answered: – When you are trying to protect the Soviet heritage, objectively tell me that you destroyed the monuments to Stalin, and we (Russian authorities. – The monuments of Lenin. « Kommersant ») defended. » The Communists should remember this care, and united Russians – “prepare for these issues and reasonably discuss”, summed up Vyacheslav Volodin.
There were no objections from the Communists, and the speaker did not stop there and remembered the CPSU renaming Stalingrad. “Who did it? Silent, they did it yourself! Now say: return! Why renamed? Did you condemn Stalin? Adhere to this line. Revised? Then repent, ”the chairman of the State Duma called.“ And Yeltsin was non -partisan? ” Why didn’t you see him when he moved along the party line? .. «
« And you? » -at last someone from the Communist Party faction could not stand it. “You were the secretary of the district committee (probably Vladimir Kashin, who held this post in one of the districts of the Moscow Region, entered into a skirmish with the speaker. « Kommersant »), and I am an ordinary member of the party, ”said Mr. Volodin. « And what’s the difference? » – the communist did not calm down. “Big,” the unicorn insisted.
However, the membership of the Communist Party of the Communist Party of the Communist Party were neither in person or in absentia. The deputies surveyed assured Kommersant that they “know” the chairman of the State Duma well, are not offended by his “hairpins” and at all seeing a reason for an ideological dispute.
