If Parliament is not seized, censorship would be « a moral obligation » – Liberation

Second pressure for François Bayrou in a few days, After that of the RN. The first secretary of PS Olivier Faure said this Saturday, March 29, that on the issue of pension reform, the Parliament should be seized after discussions between social partners, otherwise the government’s censorship would be a « Moral obligation ».

Mid-March, François Bayrou closed the door to a return to retirement at 62in full discussions of this « conclave » on pensions. The Prime Minister therefore has « Already given the conclusion that he was drawing himself »criticized Olivier Faure during an interview on LCI.

« Despite everything, you have unions and employers who decided to continue to discuss»»he noted. “This means that the question of legal age is always on the table. As long as the discussion takes place, it must be let it extend ”underlined the socialist.

Then François Bayrou got « Committed to seizing the Parliament, which must have the last word on the question of pensions », added the boss of the roses. “Parliament must, at one point, is seized. If it were not, then actually, censorship would obviously be a moral obligation for me compared to the French and the French who trusted us to carry this message ”, he hammered.

Arriving in Matignon, François Bayrou had offered to the social partners of rediscover the contested reform of pensionsobtaining in return that the socialists do not censor it on the budget.

In campaign for a fourth term at the head of the Socialist PartyOlivier Faure, saying « confident » In his re -election, his record also defended on Saturday.

During « The two years that have just passed, all the decisions I proposed to the vote of our national bodies and to the activists were adopted unanimously or almost unanimous », He said, citing in particular the censorship of the government of Michel Barnier and the non-censorship of that of his successor François Bayrou.