How much was Vucic’s rally in Belgrade? – Politics

Just arriving at the rally, it cost 12. 000 dinars

Dušan Nikezić, the Prophet and Vice President of Freedom and Justice, says that although that countermiti experienced full fiasco, all Serbian citizens will cost tens of millions of euros, according to Vucić’s analysis.

« Only for arrival, 12,000 dinars, plus transportation from Northern Macedonia, Montenegro, entertainers, tents, fences, technical support … and everything else we had the opportunity to see in the center of Belgrade, » Nikezic states.

According to him, since she called on a non-diver’s income for weeks, it is clear that all citizens of Serbia will pay and this artificial respiration for Vučić’s ego, as they have been paying the blockade and destruction of the Pioneering Park for months.

Nikezic believes that it is completely anyway whether this money is paid directly from the Serbian budget, parameters of all citizens, or paid by Aleksandar Vučić, params that have already been looted in corrupt dilutions. Adds that it is just a form.

« The essence is that this performance, as well as everything that Vučić works for years, all citizens of Serbia, who are 15. Marta and 12. April unequivocally said that they no longer want to lose any legitimacy, » Nikezic alleged him.

He dragged and paid people from Macedonia, Montenegro, Republika Srpska, diaspora … and collected only about 20 thousand.

Less love than in Pazar,
Less energy than in Nis,
Fewer youngness than in Novi Sad,
Less syllables than in Kragujevac,
5 times fewer people than in celebration and
20 …

– Dušan Nikezić (@dusannikezic) April 13, 2025

* Will this gathering be paid out of budget or « black funds »

And the Serbian movement of Dver, believes that the three-day gathering called « Don’t give Serbia » in Belgrade, where he spoke Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić « costed citizens at least 10 million euros. »

« When we include free food and drinks for the present, buses from all parts of Serbia and the countries of the region, a daily basis, is due to a dizzying figure of at least 10 million euros that were consumed to feed Ego Aleksandra Vučić ».

Whether all costs are paid from the budget or from the ‘black’ funds that arose to looting on furnished tenders, the public will probably find out only after the situation of the current regime « , considered in the dverts.

And Dušan Radosavljević, a MP, has a dilemma that Vučić’s three-day rally costs a lot, free food, free food and beverages, three days, chairs, dailyies to come, rich fields for performers and security.

« It’s all paid by corruption, abducted by the citizens, many who were learning from the president, but they were spoken by the President of the President of this, the 15th time of the citizens, all of which were to come, and there were no trains, buses And the plane that day, even a city transport. Despite his money and the effort for their expensive, the effect was very small, but the amount of rubbish and clutter who remained bigger « , allegations of Radosavljevic.

* There is no information that is the official organizer of the set

Nemanja Nenadić, Program Director Transparency Serbia, also believes that Vučić’s rally cost several million euros.

« At this point, there is too stranger to be exactly how much the rally was held in front of the Assembly in the name, as he said, a movement for the people and the state. The Association under such a name was registered on 28.mart this year, but the dilemma is that it is commonly announced Movement, since the association registered a person who is not in the list of members of the initiative movement, « says Nenadic.

He notes that it is an important unknown, as well as people in Belgrade, in order to attend the rally, because their number was higher than the number of those who were indeed on a plateau in front of the Assembly. Among the costs of the gathering, as they say, and performs individual singers and groups, as well as scenography.

* Only the transport of Mitingasha cost a million IPO euros

When it comes to the costs of events, as Nenadić says, the most obvious ones are concerned about the transport of a large number of participants.

« About 3,000 buses were agigated for these needs. Only for the bus lease was needed to be published in the field that many participants were recovered to that expensive, and after the amount of this compensation was published, that it was 50 euros.

« To a greater extent than food and drinks were provided for the participants, and in all, the costs, but also local governments, in each case, which they had trups measured by millions of euros, » the program manager of Serbia’s transparency.

More important than the cost of the costs were, as our interlocutor points out, who paid them.

« Even in the case that the SNS and other ruling coalitions formally organized this event, they would have an obligation to record costs in their annual financial report for 2025. Year, or submit to the Agency to prevent corruption, if it requests it. »

« If the participants were paid out some diary, and if the payments would have to be performed in accordance with the Law on Financing of Political Activities, and that it is about the participation of certain public institutions, it is almost certain that it is contrary to the rules that regulate their work and the rules for financing their activities.

* Problem Passivity Agency to Prevent Corruption

However, as the biggest problem in relation to all this, Sagvornik Dane is considered, is passivity that the Corruption Agency showed, as in other, similar occasions.

When two years ago, the SNS held a rally in front of the Assembly, the Agency did not use its powers to collect information on the financing of the set, and when the SNS filed a financial report for 2023. The public event does not even mention.

« The Agency did not initiate an incomplete report. The report of the annual financial reporting agency was published in February, but the agency has had a lot of work around the control of parliamentary and local controls will be published in the shortest possible time, but it will be Today, two months after the expiration of the deadline was not published, « Nenadic concludes.