How much of the unique fronting of the opposition, students and citizens were actually unique? – Politics

Dragan Bjelogrlić, Film Delete and one of the founders of proclamation, stated It is recently that the moment that one front resistance against the dark future is formed with citizens and students, who will perform Serbia from the deep crisis.

From today, struggle must be monolithic and stronger, all social factors must be united, Bjelogrlić said at the opening table of proclamation, where representatives of the citizen group from different parts of Serbia participated.

Zdravko Ponoš, President and Member of Serbia, parties, which proposed part of the Group of the Parliamentary Confidence, thinks that the depth of crisis in Serbia is such that « a unique front of reasonable and responsible factors is actually necessary ».

« In particular, keeping the ultimate unaccountable approach that goes to radicalization and that shows the government not a solution to exit the country from the crisis, but for its own survival at the cost of the conflict, » says pride for today.

He underlines that it would be irresponsible that « on this democratic side we are exhausted in the burning and conflicts about small differences, » small, notes, in relation to what the people raised.

Aleksandar Pavić, the MP is the strength of the people, a movement that did not participate in the transitional government proposal. Pavić believes that the new United Front of the Opposition would represent a new version of DOS, with whose, as it states, the negative heritage of Serbia and Dan – today is carried.

« Likewise, we believe that there is no essential government between the proclamation and current political scenes, at the time when the EU is rapidlying to us that it only wants to execute worn and compromised elites with new and washable, which would only be more successful They conducted what was expected from Brussels, Berlin, Paris and London, « he points for today.

He adds that « my strength » wants that, through fair and free elections, it will allow for the choice of the third, sovereignist road, adapted to new political and geopolitical circumstances, and says that they are ready, as so far, to cooperate with other political actors.

Student divisions due to expert government

And while proclamation and part of the parliamentary opposition propose a transitional government, students in the blockade of universities in Serbia, primarily called for choirs, are divided into this issue.

Students in the blockade of the Nis University, who have already publicly announced that the « expert Government » in Belgrade, according to this issue, and are organized by plenums at the various colleges on which to be debated and decided in the manner of politically articulated, but still without The unique position of these two Belgrade universities.

In the email we had insight, Niški students told Belgrade counterparts to support the Initiative of the Expert Government, which they have not yet presented them as soon as possible, « because the factual response is necessary and that it is a timely reaction necessary. »

As a reaction to such discussions in the plenums in Belgrade, the statement of the Faculty of Philosophy, which expressed suspicion of the term « Eskpert », said that he was ideologically colored and that there was no legal acts, a document or text that gives someone that title.

They added that the expert government is elected by the National Assembly by most votes of the total MPs, and to be able to seek to constitute the government, which is contrary to what is its interest, because such a goal can only be achieved by social pressure.

They are proud to debate, Pavić with the students of philosophical

Inquiries whether students, given the arrangement record, should be dealing with a transitional, relative expert government at all, our opposition interlocutors answer differently.

Until the proud tells that it is good that the topic of the transitional government gained due attention, Pavić states that he agreed with the critical analysis of students of the Faculty of Philosophy.

« It is good that the transitional government topic gained due attention. This shows that the most actors from this democratic solution for exit the crisis. The unique frontage would be involved in modalities. It is good that this discussion in public » indicates.

Proš believes that students will find a way through their way to decide a way, notifiable, notifying that the opposition has already done the proposal of the concept of government folk trust that is open to upgrade.

« We have already expressed that we are against the proposed concept of the so-called transitional government of experts. And no one of the proposers consulted even about or called us to support it, » said Aleksandar Pavić.

It adds that the movement whose part is advocated all the time to the government’s terminal, the only task was to prepare fair and free sources and the release of the media.

« We are against the concept of » experts « , first of all the experience with G17 +, long ago compromised, and we agree to the critical analysis of that concept, published by the students of the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade, » he notes.

As for students, Pavić says that they agree with the part of students who repeatedly expressed indentation reserves in party or NGOs political projects – « which would use the energy of the student movement for some other goals. »

« We believe that this student’s protest movement has already collected its place in the history of student movements, and that students should decide for themselves in which the direction will further develop », says the People’s strength.

Ivković: activities in order to fulfill existing requests passed by Zenith

Analyst Aleksandar Ivković states that it is not to expect all political actors and that all faculty and other citizens are part of the unique front. « It just has too many differences and among the opposition, but also among the plenums, we see ideological differences, which indicates the statement of the Faculty of Philosophy, » indicates.

However, Ivković does not fully exclude that most relevant social actors, opposition, students and others, sign an agreement that would define a common goal, so that in this context they work together in this context. He says that many colleges are in favor, especially outside Belgrade, supported the proposal of the expert government.

« It needs to be despaired by that unique Front, it means that the opposition and the students are signed, or to sit in one hundred and contributed to who what to do, it will not happen, because students will not want to approach the opposition. »

Unique front, it was considered at the beginning of the year when students organized large protests throughout Serbia, because all the plenums worked in the same goal in order to meet the requirements, and there was supporting universities, but also certain support, not only passive, opposition. Restoring the unique goal of all, or at least most of the prey, it must be the first step, underline.

« After 15. Marta every prey went on his side, some successful, or at least most of the plenum began to exit such a government, so that students support them and then to make their activities to do Pressure on the government to fulfill that, and that the opposition continued to support as so far. It’s just a question of whether that pressure would be enough, « he says.

Ivkovic, questioned whether students should deal with the transitional government at all, saying that they are for them what they think is more effective. « Activities in the purpose of fulfilling current student requests, in terms of energy, who would have been able to support the students, which would take new energy protests and would have become more coordinated. It would create additional pressure and drove power in the even greater Defender, which would be useful for protesters, because when the government returns to the offensive applies repressive measures and expect it to continue, « he believes.

The unique front could be useful even if the power does not accept the transitional authority, as it could be a joint defense mechanism from the repression of government, and today, Ivković, miss.

Asked for criticism and acts of opposition to the regime, that the transitional government’s idea, our interlocutor fits that their proposal is not aware that they will not be able to impose in the first line successfully and gain support to students and citizens.

« Parliamentary and Outparmant’s opposition that proposes all the second more than the idea of ​​being changed to the expectations of their voters, as one of the ideas of opposition, » says, he says, that he is the problem of opposition She collided the trust in the citizens herself.

Ivković sees a way of political articulation despite the transitional government. « When we know when elections, citizens will probably find representatives in these elections, to the beginning of June, the election should be held by the election by the end of this week and the election will be that there will be some groups of citizens to participate, regardless of whether parliamentary Oppositions boycotts. Participants in these elections will try to show as carriers of political articulation of protests, and see how successful it will be. The establishment will be quite harder than some new actors. «