How long did the investigation arrive on the use of « sound cannon »? – Society
After a little more than two weeks, since the « sound top » was used over the protesters, the investigation was officially launched, but there is still no indication that a concrete shift has been achieved in the investigation.
Currently, the investigation is conditionally said, it takes place on three levels.
As part of the domestic investigation, the first basic public prosecutor’s office in Belgrade was launched. However, legal viewing did not even initiate an official investigation, but this Prosecution has only formed an object regarding the event 15. Marta and it is to collect evidence data.
They are from the prosecution for Insider briefly answered their question as far as they arrived with the investigation.
« The first basic public prosecutor’s office in Belgrade, it formed the case, and on the occasion of the Prosecution to collect the data that persons suffered injuries, that is, we are not able to present other information at this stage, » they said from this Prosecution.
Another level of investigation, if this word can be used at this time, should work American FBI and Russian FSB.
According to the authorities, the FSB operators have already arrived in Serbia, while it is Time He announced that they did not confirm from the FBI, but they did not even deny their arrival.
Stojanovic: Engaging the FBI and FSB proof of collapsed trust in institutions
The former director of the Military Security Agency Momir Stojanović for today says that the engagement of foreign institutions, by the authorities, to conduct an investigation in their own country in practice very rarely or almost ever applied.
« The engagement of foreign institutions to conduct an investigation in a country can only be applied only when it comes to events or processes relevant to a wider international community, which in case of air-hot cannon is not the case, » says Stojanovic.
He adds that the decision of the authorities is to hire the FBI and FSB motivated by this to calm the domestic public that has no confidence in domestic services.
« The decision of the authorities for the engagement of FSB and FBA is intended to die domestic public in the absence of respective foreign institutions. But this raises the issue of non-confidence in which the authority must trust, » said Momir Stojanović for today.
European Court of Human Rights
On behalf of 47 citizens of civil society organization, the CLIEND, Femplatz, Civic Initiatives and Initiative for Economic and Social Rights A11 addressed the European Court of Human Rights regarding the event 15. Marta on the protest.
The state Serbia received deadline from this court by 31. Marta to declare whether the 15th March was used to unauthorized funds against citizens.
On the last day of the deadline, the European Court of Human Rights informed civil society organizations that he received the response of the Republic of Serbia in connection with the provides possible use of Sonic Weapons on the protest in Belgrade 15. Marta.
The Court in Strasbourg called on civil society organizations to until 8. April submits comments to the response of the state. In the same time, until 8. April, the European Court of Human Rights called on the Republic of Serbia to submit their comments to the Civil Society Organizations to the Court on Monday, 31. Marta, which informed the Court.
Vladica Ilić from the Belgrade Center for Human Rights explains for today who are the following possible steps, after Serbia’s country responded to this Court.
« We received the answer of the state from the court and now we are making comments on this answer. At this point, we would like Serbia to the Court, because we would be counterproductive until we send a court comments to the response of the state, » says Ilic.
He adds that the European Court may present some of the temporary measures to the state at this time.
« This Court has a broader range of temporary measures that can be measured in civil procedures, such as the proceedings in the case of the proceedings. The court in this case may order Serbia that it must not use similar funds, as those who are citizens They reported that they were used, or to list the state to take some actions, « he said.
Vladica Ilic says that the state is obliged to act on the orders of the Court.
« If the state is disrupted on the orders of this Court, this would automatically mean violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, whose SERBIA is the signatory, » says Vladica Ilić for today.
MUP, other security services and power continue to deny the use of a sound warm
As soon as 15. March in the evening appeared that the sound cannon was used over the citizens, the president of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić announced and categorically denied that anyone used a sound resort on the protest.
The MIA also categorically denied allegations of the use of a sound warm.
As long as the Minister of Police, Ivica Dacic did not admit that the MUP still possesses sound cannons of the American manufacturer LRAD, the authority denied that security services have such resources.
However, power is caught talking untruths precisely thanks to the statement of the Ivica Dacic who said that such means stand in MUP warehouses and not in use.
The next day is Our newspaper proved That such funds are mounted on the vehicles of the Gendarmerie by publishing a photo of the vehicle of the Gendarmerie in front of the National Assembly on which such a device was mounted.
Follow us on our Facebook and Instagram page, but also on X account. Subscribe to PDF List release today.
