Henry Doctor, who humiliated the « Ball »

Were armed up to teeth

As already writtenEdgar Kalasūnas, who has been to the list of European criminals for several years and has been on the list of European criminals for many years, has joined this crime against Kaunas District Court, who succumbed to Lithuanian law enforcement in October 2023, and Richard Baika, who is currently serving twelve years’ imprisonment for Deimantas Bugavičius. Estonian killers in November 2015.

The scenario of a loud attack in the flooded attacks was born in the case of an indictment of this case by consuming alcohol. And E. Kalasūnas and R. Baika then followed the instructions of one of the then « ball » leader Tom Mickevičius, nicknamed frog. It disappeared just half a year after the shooting of H. Daktaras Castle and the grenade in her yard, which was also stated in the indictment.

According to him, T. Mickiewicz, who himself took the Kalashnikov machine gun from the « Ball » weapons, then armed with unidentified firearms and E. Kalasūnas, Alexei Serosšštan and Edgar Tomkevicius. And along with the aforementioned three, Richard Baika, who was then armed with T. Mickiewicz’s handbags, was armed.

E. Tomkevičius died unexpectedly in January 2023-after the transfer of the « Ball » criminal organization case, from which a separate attack in Užliedžiai and one person’s murder episode, to the court. But before it can be converted. And Mr Seroššštan was still searched by the court to the court, which was also caused by his case.

The show of the surplus

According to the indictment, the idea is to demonstrate his supremacy against the leader of the Kaunas criminal world, H. Doctor, who has already been hiding from law enforcement and his authority, to the said « Ball » criminal organization and his belonging to the drunkenness – two nights before the attack.

Richard Baika

On that night of December 19, 2008, armed to teeth, by car to the flooded, they stopped at the entrance to the Gate of the Daktaras Castle. And T. Mickevičius fired at least ten times the Kalashnikov machine gun by the fence surrounding the castle and its finishing elements – owls.

After these shots, E. Kalasūnas escaped with A. Serošštan. And Mr Baika threw one grenade in the castle yard, where it exploded about two and a half meters from the residential house, where the Daktar’s spouse Ramutė with two youngest daughters was at the time.

The official owner of the castle R. Daktarienė, recognized as the victim in this case, then assessed the damage to the fence and its decorative elements – owls and window windows – at least 3,500 euros. She filed such an action to the rest of the survivors of the attack.

(Not) the expected solution

In court, R. Daktarienė refused her claim, on the grounds that she no longer wanted to have something to do with this story, as well as to see the defendants or hear them. Although giving testimony to the court, he told about the great fright he had experienced, waking up at that night from a strong hit. Even if they thought the earthquake had occurred. In addition, when he was running to the basement, watching the « shoulders ». And without understanding, he went to bed again. And the next day, the daughter, who returned from school, told about the bullets’ gate.

R. Daktarienė wrote a statement to the police about this incident only a week later. Although they admitted to seeing officers looking at their holdings the next day. However, they were delayed to contact them with a statement that he was avoiding media attention.

Two officers at the time were interviewed in court and at that time. Of course, they already remembered that event poorly. However, he confirmed his previous doubts by renowing their earlier testimony that some kind of self -propelled device could have been thrown into the courtyard of H. Daktaras Castle. Or even a firecracker, because after the grenade was blown up, there would be a non -half -meter pit.

The languages ​​were crowned with execution

Another crime that was tried in this case by E. Kalasūnas is the extremely brutal L.Z., who was convicted, but does not consider the world of organized crime, murder of bullshit in the evening of November 18, 2007 in a dormitory of Chemical Street.

According to the indictment, the offense involves the previous drinking, during which one of them began to tell L. Ž. In his speeches, he humiliates the authorist of the aforementioned T. Mickiewicz, which led to the decision to organize L. Ž. execution. And the same evening, T. Mickiewicz, who invited another « Ball » leader, Tom Gaidankas and formed those who participated in the above drink: E. Kalasūnas, Valerija Kolobovas, Edgar Zapštas, Donatas Šimelevičius and Artūras Kliauga, found out L. Ž. The company went to the aforementioned chemical street dormitory, where they were greeted by the speeches of one of T. Mickiewicz, who told Artūras Martinkus, who was no longer alive.

Execution L. Ž. a second -floor dormitory in the kitchen – in the presence of other residents – was organized. At least sixteen strokes, guests to various L. Ž. The areas of the body, including in the head, by hand, legs, metal rods and glass bottle, were fatal.

In order to conceal this crime, Mr Mickiewicz, with threats and promises of T. Gaidanka, forced him to take all the blame for Mr Martink.

The long imprisonment was threatened

E. Kalasūnas was accused of committing both the aforementioned crimes against the accomplices of selfish incentives – in order to earn the favor of the leadership of the criminal organization and the opportunity to profit from criminal offenses.

Edgar Kalasūnas/Photo by Regimantas Zakšensk

For murder in an organized group, the Criminal Code provides for imprisonment of between eight and 20 years or life imprisonment due to hooligan incentives. And for the damage to foreign property, which could have suffered by humans, illegal possession of weapons, ammunition and explosives and public order violation, and what to blame H. Kalasūnas and R. Baika, who was threatened to blame sixteen years ago, threatens imprisonment of up to eight years.

During the pre -trial investigation, E. Kalasūnas did not give testimony, as did he not disclose where he had been hiding for almost five years. After being arrested in 2019, he was arrested by declaring his search.

Strict punishments were offered

When he was in court, Mr Kalasūnas did not deny that he was then in Užliedžiai, but had not committed the crimes he was accused. He said he knew nothing about his alleged L. Ž. murder because he was not there, even though they know some of the people involved there.

He did not deny the former in Užliedžiai that night when R. Daktarienė thought the earthquake had taken place, and R. Baika. However, he also claimed that he had not been performed in the indictment.

According to law enforcement, the accusations against the defendants were also based on the testimony of persons who agreed to cooperate with them.

Prosecutor Mindaugas Sabaitis, the prosecutor of the Kaunas Regional Prosecutor’s Office, who supported the accusation in this case, was recognized as the best prosecutor of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Lithuania this year, and proposed to his E. Kalasūnas and R. Baika for the attack on the H. Daktar Castle by six years’ imprisonment. And E. Kalasūnas for his involvement in the murder of L. Ž. – Twelve years’ imprisonment. And, after the sum of both of the above sentences, to impose E. Kalasūnas sixteen years in prison.

A six -year -old prosecution offered by Mr Baika for an attack in the flooded attack was requested to summarize with a conviction for the murder of D. Bugavičius. And to impose a final sentence of sixteen years’ imprisonment.

The lawyers of E. Kalasūnas and R. Baika said the accusations against their defenders had not been proved and asked the court to acquit them.

Court verdict

The college of Kaunas Regional Court Judges Audrius Meilutis, Algirdas Giedraitis and Aušra Vingilė today announced that he recognizes E. Kalasūnas and R. Baika after committing all the crimes alleged in this case.

And divides Mr Baika for illegal possession of explosives – five years’ imprisonment, damage to R. Daktarienė’s property – one year and ten months’ imprisonment, and a violation of public order in the arrangement of an attack in Užliedžiai – one year imprisonment, imposing a final sentence for five years’ imprisonment. However, in the event of a twelve -year imprisonment for the murder of D. Bugavičius, the final punishment imposed in this case, Mr Baika, is a twelve -year imprisonment.

E. Kalasūnas was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for unlawful possession of a weapon in the flooded attack, a two -year imprisonment for R. Daktarienė’s property, and a one -year prison sentence for a public order violation of the final sentence for the attack on Daktar Castle. And for L. Ž. murder – thirteen years’ imprisonment. However, after the summary of both of the aforementioned punishments, the final sentence in this case was imposed on E. Kalasūnas, a thirteen -year imprisonment.

When R. Daktarienė took her claim, no more claims in this case were left.

E. Kalasūnas and R. Baika and their lawyers may appeal to the higher court of appeal with their lawyers.

Eloquent slap

As already written, another case is being heard in Kaunas Regional Court, where E. Kalasūnas is accused of organizing two-person murder in a generally dangerous way in the autumn of 2019 in Kaunas and Pakauna. Their lives were unsuccessful in Garliava and Vilijampolė, suspecting them in cooperation with Lithuanian law enforcement. And then, according to the indictment of this case, E. Kalasūnas, like the other person in this case, used a pistol with a muffler against the victims, not only in Europe, but also in South America and Africa, associated The victims in this case include a cousin and the other a former neighbor.

E. Kalasūnas, 42, has been convicted twice until today’s sentence. 20 years ago, that is, at the age of 22, for murder (with his friends fatally beaten against his aunt’s abused man). And was sent for this crime for seven years behind bars. And in 2010, it seems that, as soon as he returned from the above imprisonment, he was convicted of unlawful possession of weapons, ammunition or explosives, which was punished only by probation.