Gouveia and Melo wants to clarify local accommodation property in Alentejo

The not yet candidate but already a favorite of the race to Belém issued a clarification on the fact that he owns a local accommodation in Odemira, Alentejo.

At issue is a magazine article Saturday that states that Admiral Gouveia and Melo did not include income from local accommodation in the statement delivered to the Constitutional Court and an entity for transparency, and the one who was obliged, when he was head of staff of the Armada and who will have to do again when finally assumed the candidacy for presidentials.

The admiral’s response is that there is no income of that property, on the contrary.

“It is absolutely false that I, Henrique Gouveia and Melo, explore a local accommodation and not declare him in taxes,” he begins by stating the Admiral, in the clarification that the sunrise had access.

« I am an copropritist in 50% of a property in S. Luís, Odemira, holding only the rights of root (ownership). My ex-wife holds the remaining 50%. My mother holds, vitalically, the enjoyment of the property, » she says, adding that she does not obtain « any yields » of local accommodation and that eventual profits from exploitation « are invoiced in an individual name. » ex-wife and appear in her IRS statement.

Gouveia and Melo assures that not only has no income with AL, but still has expenses. « The expenses of maintenance and conservation of the property have widely exceeded the revenues obtained by al. As a root co -owner, I have a legal obligation to support the conservation expenses of the infrastructure, which I have been fulfilling. »

Still on Saturday’s news, the admiral stresses that when he took office as CEMA in 2022, it was not required “the statement of income from the spouse or family members” and ensures that it declared “all bank accounts and all assets” that the Admiral and women held at the date of the declaration, although they were already “de facto separated”.

But the nearly candidate for presidentials goes further and sends to the Sol a document of the Constitutional Court where it is read that « the declarant (Gouveia and Melo) should not be considered, legally obliged to present, in this Constitutional Court, of the single statement. »