For the grass burner – conflict

The woman noticed the child during the day. According to her, he tried to set the grass on the grass and had a special lighter with him.

She reported this to members of the group on social networks, hoping that the minor’s parents would see the record.

« I very much hope that there are parents of this little grass burner in this group and will talk to their child. As I was caught at the crime scene, I couldn’t talk to him.

People’s reactions were negative, but not because of the child’s behavior, but because the woman was filming and published a video in a storyline.

One commentator attacked the woman that she should replace the strangers’ children and stop calling the police for « little things. »

« You still count the dog’s stools, » the Klaipėda resident resented.

Aurelija Maslauskienė / Photo by Vytautas Liaudanskis

The woman who posted the video in these comments did not respond, so the conflict did not last.

Nevertheless, such insults, according to the Civil Code, are subject to a call to court.

« The person has the right to demand a judicial denying the disseminated data that degrade his or her honor and dignity and inappropriate reality, as well as compensation for the material and non -pecuniary damage caused to him by dissemination of such data, » the Civil Code states.

Aurelija Maslauskienė, Chief Specialist of the State Fire Department of the Klaipėda Fire and Rescue Board, reminded me of what was inadvertently burned in the grass.

« If there are favorable weather conditions for fires in open areas, the meadow may ignite the fire source. In this case, the child may have burned himself, not to control the situation, as is usually the case with such children’s games. Want to be stumbled upon, to do an experiment, but does not control the situation.