avril 21, 2025
Home » Extremist Bombic violates the court regulations, the prosecutor suggested him custody

Extremist Bombic violates the court regulations, the prosecutor suggested him custody

Extremist Bombic violates the court regulations, the prosecutor suggested him custody


17. Apr 2025 at 22:10 I Updated at 22:19

The police detained him on Wednesday.

BRATISLAVA. Prosecutor of the Department of Serious Crime General Prosecutor’s Office The Slovak Republic filed a petition to the specialized criminal court to take the accused extremist Daniel Bombic into custody.

The reason is the failure to fulfill obligations, respectively. Violation of restrictions imposed on the accused the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic. The proposal was delivered to the Banská Bystrica workplace of the Special Court on Thursday late in the evening.

The article continues under video advertising

The article continues under video advertising

This stems from the information provided by TASR spokeswoman of the General Prosecutor’s Office Jana Tökölyová.

« The prosecutor of the Department of Serious Crime of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Slovak Republic filed a petition to the judge for pre -trial proceedings today for a specialized criminal court to take the DB accused of extremist crime, » the spokeswoman said.

Related article Bombic continues to hateful posts. The investigator does not know what to do with him Read

Police of the Criminal Police Department of the Regional Directorate of the Police Force in Bratislava detained Bombica on Wednesday 16 April. In the past, three arrests were issued for him.

At the end of January he was escorted from Great Britain to Slovakia. The prosecutor subsequently filed a proposal to take Bombica into custody.

Although the pre -trial judge stated the merits of criminal prosecution in January, he did not find out the reasons for taking the accused into custody. Therefore, he released him to freedom.

At the beginning of February, the Supreme Court decided on the complaint of the prosecutor against this decision and although it found the reasons for the so -called. preventive and escape custody, replaced it by imposing several obligations and restrictions, including the obligation to wear a monitoring bracelet.



View Original Source