» ‘Exposure to the Russian Federation’ ‘: in the US Ministry of Finance revealed Trump’s expectations from the subsoil agreement
Donald Trump, Photo: Getty Images
The United States Finance Minister, Scott Bessent at the Global Milken Institute in Los Angeles, said Donald Trump, Head of White House, intends to use the Nadra Donra Agreement with Ukraine as an instrument of pressure on Russia in the context of peace talks.
Source: “European Truth”
Details: Bessent stated that the idea of a mineral agreement was Trupova, and also noted that the American leader was convinced – she would produce several results.
Advertising:
One of the results, the US Finance Minister called « additional levers of influence » on the Russian leadership.
Direct language of Bessent: « First, it will create additional levers for him in negotiations with the Russian leadership when the right moment will come. »
Details: Also, he said, the idea was to sign an agreement that would show that « there is no difference between the US and the Ukrainian people. »
Direct language of Bessent: « It was to become a symbol for the Ukrainians that the United States is nearby. It should also be a signal for a tired American public, which is skeptical of new financial obligations that it is possible to have a common prosperity with Ukraine. And in some ways it would be a silent security guarantee through economic partnership.
Prehistory:
- On April 30, Ukraine and the United States concluded an economic partnership framework agreement. Earlier, « Euro truth » revealed the main details of the agreement in which it is about 57 minerals and about US military assistance.
- US President Donald Trump has stated that a subsoil agreement will give the US more than was spent on Ukraine.
- Recently Prime Minister of Ukraine Denis Shmigal expressed expectations that the Verkhovna Rada ratifies the signed Nadra Agreement with the US by May 8.
- Currently, « technical » agreements have not been signed, not signed and published, without which it is impossible to draw conclusions about the feasibility of ratification and the long -term consequences of the agreement for Ukraine.
More in the articleand: Makes in exchange for weapons. That has entered the US Agreement with the US and what are the risks left