European Prosecutor’s Office to disclose the required amount of information
The Union of Judges in Bulgaria spread an opinion on the inspection of the Bulgarian European Prosecutor Teodora Georgieva, which « Dnevnik » publishes.
The Union of Judges in Bulgaria notes another case in which publicly dominated the functioning of centers for the exercise of illegitimate power, which already affect not only the judiciary in Bulgaria, but also the activities of the European Prosecutor’s Office for its commissioning, and to lift and defend the crimes of the crimes.
Data on suspected attempts to press and influence the European prosecutor for Bulgaria Theodora Georgieva in connection with her work, along with the publication of videos and allegations that her current position was assisted by her current position from assisting from her current position from her current position.
Currently, the search for a European arrest warrant, Petio Petrov, nicknamed the « euro », require a clear clarification by the relevant competent authorities, which should provide the public with the necessary information on the case.
We believe that the current situation is a direct function of the lack of a relevant timely institutional response to the many data on the activities of groups that are experiencing attempts to press and impact influence on the justice bodies in Bulgaria. In this direction, we recall that:
– Despite the information presented more than five years ago to the Judicial College of the Supreme Judicial Council by the judges Tsvetko Lazarov and Vladislava Constantinople for specific actions of such a group of persons,
– Despite the public information on established criminal activity of the same persons from a law enforcement,
– Despite the statement more than a year ago by a Deputy City Prosecutor that the « matter of days » before the murder of Martin Bozhanov – the notary public was his involvement in criminal liability for property fraud, money laundering and coercion against judges, judges,
– Despite the call of 21.03.2024 of four of the most representative and authoritative European professional organizations of judges and prosecutors to effectively investigate these cases
| At present, it is not known that charges against participants in the respective groups and persons allegedly involved in their activities, which are involved in the current scandal, have been filed. |
It is also necessary to recall that with a series of opinions and addresses – from 08.02.2024, 19.02.2024, 16.05.2024, 23.06.06.2024, 07.01.2025, the Management Board of the Judges in Bulgaria has repeatedly insisted Publicly known groups have used funds to compromise and pressure on judges, prosecutors and investigators, who were the members of these groups and which other persons and magistrates supported this activity.
However, despite the repeated calls, it was not even a final report from the work of these questionnaires to the Supreme Judicial Council and three consecutive folk
Meetings. Независимо от събраните писмени материали и проведените изслушвания от Временната комисия към Съдийската колегия на Висшия съдебен съвет за проверка съпричастността на съдии по случая « Мартин Божанов – Нотариуса » 10 и от Прокурорската колегия на Висшия съдебен съвет не се достигна и до реализиране на дисциплинарна отговорност на магистрати за свързаност с тези групи.
It is recalled that in the latter such an argument for an unlawful influence on representatives of the judicial system from the hidden « staff », known as Krasimir Georgiev – « Krasio Black », in 2010, the only way to publicly establish the problems was to open all the facts and channels of influence that the latter had in the court system. The imposition of the relevant disciplinary sanctions on the magistrates involved then became possible after assistance by the then prosecution management and the provision of data on communication by candidates for senior positions regarding the upcoming SJC decisions for their occupation.
In the present case
| It remains unclear whether among the materials that were seized during the procedural actions in the course of pre -trial proceedings, there are also those that were created for the purpose of holding, depending on magistrates and whether they are also distributed for meetings with Petio Petrov, who have been discussed, to whom they have been discussed The holding of the position of European prosecutor. |
Remained unconvincingly distracted and the serious suspicion of the attachment of the management of
The prosecutor’s office with the same centers of influence and the opportunity for the latter to continue to exert pressure.
The European Prosecutor’s Office in Bulgaria is an unwanted phenomenon
All this, in accordance with the circumstances that in the procedure for offering candidates for
European prosecutor from Bulgaria was a decisive role in representatives of the executive branch, and in the course of the current scandal by Mrs. Theodora Georgieva, allegations were made that she felt threatened by the leader of a parliamentary party,
| requires an emergency and decisive intervention of all responsible institutions as well as the itself European prosecutor’s office, which should also provide the provision of the relevant socially relevant information. |
In the first place, insofar as Teodora Georgieva was a judge before being elected as a European prosecutor, we are calling on the Judicial College of the Supreme Judicial Council to restore the work of the interim committee that establishes facts about pressure and threats to judges by Martin Bozhanov – a notary of the Poom. persons and all related magistrates, and the information collected to serve for subsequent disciplinary actions.
Has she breathed or did not breathe the truth while the state burns
We are calling on the Supreme Judicial Councilin his plenary, to consider the establishment of a joint committee that analyzes the materials collected so far within the activities of the two colleges and to take the necessary action to establish the overall influence of the groups of Martin Bozhanov and Petyo Petrov on representatives of
The judiciary.
We also call on MPs Again, form a temporary committee to deal with the mechanisms of pressure on judges, prosecutors and investigators to determine the reasons for the participants, the related magistrates, and to recommend relevant actions.
We also call on Prosecutor Teodora Georgieva herself To provide full information about whether she had contact with Petio Petrov, on what reason, which other persons participated in such contacts, and to reveal all known information about the possibilities for exerting pressure against magistrates, including the composition of the European Prosecutor’s Office, in order to be successfully investigated and punished.
Finally, although the situation is a precedent and can negatively affect the institution’s work
| We also call on the European Prosecutor’s Office to disclose the required amount of information to dispel the dissemination of speculative statements in public space |
We believe that such information can be given on questions about what actions or what production, if such public data, the administrative review of Mrs. Theodora Georgieva has been opened, what principles will be evaluated publicly records, if they will be appreciated at all, and how the magistrates can be protected, including the composition of the European prosecutor.
| We also find what the European Commission is about to assess whether the existing selection mechanism and subsequent examination of the European prosecutors provide sufficient guarantees for their independence and relaxing and effective work, and to propose the necessary regulatory changes in the acts of the European Union. |
Only in the conditions of transparency of the responsible institutions will it be possible both to establish the facts that enable citizens to be fully informed about what is happening and to seek the full responsibility of the disciplinary violations or crimes.
