Ekaterina Mihailova: The two sword MPs could swear later, instead of breaking the group

It had to wait this week, allowing the newly announced MPs to take an oath instead of disbanding the sword’s parliamentary group. This is how you commented on the BBC the case with the deletion of the GG of the Sword Prof. Ekaterina Mihailova, a law teacher at New Bulgarian University.

The Constitution does not indicate an oath of MPs.,

Perhaps it is no accident, which means that the hypothesis of a reasonable time is working, said Mihailova. He added: The CEC decision announcing the election of the second MP was released on Thursday, and the deletion of the parliamentary group was announced on Friday, when to swear the person, why he had to rush.

The two sword MPs were announced with decisions of the CEC on March 14 (Ivan Ivanov) and on March 20 (Plamen Petkov). On March 21, Friday, at about 6.30 am, after the vote of the budget, Parliament Chairman Natalia Kiselova announced the deletion of the GG of the sword.

Ekaterina Mihailova is convinced that by next week the case, which she believes is a « storm in a glass of water », will find permission quiet and meekly, even if you have to change the Parliament’s rules.

Asked about the political reading of the case, Mihailova, who once as a deputy participated in the preparation of various rules for the work of the National Assembly, commented that the majorities were guided in the creation of the norms « to help or to prevent ».

If it is true what is hovering – from 10 to become 12 necessary MPs for the formation of a parliamentary group, it will be discriminatory

Now the requirement – 10 MPs for a parliamentary group – meets the 4 % barrier. If the required number rises to 12, the reached 4 percent threshold will not be able to form a parliamentary group and hence – they lose the rights of other MPs for full participation in parliamentary work, which is discriminatory, Mihailova explained.