Don't look logic where they are not / day

We are currently in the government's « restart » process. How do you look at all this – what was it at all? « Restarts » itself as a process – the dismissal of three ministers and the nomination of three new candidates – and why is this combination of dismissed ministers?

There were two tasks in the process. The first is to dismiss (former Minister of Transport Kaspar) Brišken (Progressive) Because he is simply tired of everyone, not only tired, but he is really insufficient. And the other, to preserve the Prime Minister's post for Evika Silina (JV) after the dismissal of Brišken, had to be dismissed by two more ministers – one from each coalition party one by one. As a result, it was a complete illogue, in which the only logic is to keep Silina. That's it.

Okay, everything is clear about Brišken, but the other two are the Minister of Welfare Uldis Augulis (ZZS) and the Minister of Education and Science Anda Čakša (JV) – there is some internal mutual agreement and then some people have a public wonder about dismissal, or is it really Silina's own decision?

It looks and is just a decision by Silina, it is absolutely obvious that there was no party advice, because if there was really a restart that could be called the restart, not the handheld, then of course the whole coalition would come together: « We have something for us.