Does the opposition should withdraw lists in Kosjeric and Zajecar? – Politics

– According to the current indicators of the election theft in Zajecar and Kosjerić, anywhere in Serbia will not suit the real mood of the people who oppose the dictatorial order of Aleksandra Vučić, President Vojislav Mihailović, President POCs recently in the statement.

« We invite opposition election lists, until May 22nd when all the time is 8. June to block all the election that they are more possible. This election farsa serves a dictatorship of Alexander Vučić to try to create an illusion that He has the support of citizens. We must not allow it to him, not only because of these places, but also of Serbia and its future, « Mihailović said.

In Zajecar and Kosjerić, 8. June maintain regular local elections, and the deadline for submission of the list has already expired.

In Kosjerić, three election lists have been declared so far, and some more are expected to be declared within the deadline. The opposition united to one list thanks to the call and support of students in the blockade.

1.HOALITION OF SERBIAN PRODVE CARS, SOCIALIST PARTIES OF SERBIA AND THE UNITED Pensioners of Serbia

2. SERBIAN CARCER – Serbia in Briks – Slobodan Nikolic

3.gg United for Kosjerić (United Opposition of Kosjerić)

In Zajecar, eight elective lists have been declared so far:

1. We do not give Serbia – Aleksandar Vučić (SNS, PUPS, PS, SDPS, SNP)
2. Change in which we trust Uglješa Đuričković – Dragana Rašić, (NPS), (PSG) I (SAA)
3. United for Spas Zajecar – Miladin Krstić – Mirko Jelenković
4. Dr. Nenad Ristović – Homes for Zajecar
5. Ivica Dacic – Socialist Party of Serbia – Decisively for Zajecar
6. Coalition for Eastern Serbia – Sasa Radulović Grljanac
7. We strength of the people – Dr. Branimir Nestorović for the city of Zajecar
8. Serbian Liberals – Da Struka Pita – Vladimir Kovačević

The lack of community among opposition actors, according to our interlocutors, harms the fight against the regime, and isolated initiatives, such as POX’s call, rated as counterproductive.

Djordje Vukadinović, the editor of the new Serbian political thought, in principle, principally, considers the mentioned POX proposal valid and justified, at least in the part of the withdrawal of opposition lists due to different and already confirmed machinations by the authorities.

– But the problem with both this and many similar proposals and initiatives are that they remain mostly lonely and therefore, even when they are justified and further contribute to the impression of opposition division and weakness – Vukadinović points out.

Aleksandar Olenik, a member of the LSV Presidency, says the united Front of Students and Oppositions is the only way to elect the student list at this time is the main indicator of who is the opposition and who helps the regime.

– That is why this call is POKS is premature and is not in an intres of the opposition. Such and similar decisions must be made at the level of unique Front of Students and Opposition because the rifted among citizens who are ready to collapse in the elections by Vučić’s regime – says our decoration.

In particular, olenic says students have public support higher than 60 percent but that does not mean so much support in elections, and that if the goal is to achieve such score and in elections, a unique front represents the only solution.

– Any splitting or preventing the unique front formation goes in favor of the regime – concludes.

Nikola Jovanović, Director of the Local Self-Government, believes that it is the only essential political issue at this time to deal with extraordinary parliamentary elections and how to help students win this system with a list of new and unsolved persons, who would enjoy majority support for citizens.

He adds that local in the election in these two municipalities, nor can there be a good solution for them today, and that in that light, the proposal of POKs would only further distract the authority from the idea to announce the parliamentary elections.

– It would be much more expedient that their MPs boycott the work of parliament, or even return the mandate, because it would be stronger pressure on the regime and pointed out the extraordinary situation in which we are concluded by our interlocutor.