Does matter if the woman knew that the name would be stated

Eva H. Önnudóttir, a political scientist, says it is not necessarily unnatural that the Minister of Education and Children's Affairs has been informed of the name of the sender who wanted to get a meeting with the prime minister. It needs to be looked at in the context of whether the sender was aware that his name would be expressed as soon as he said that Ásthildur Lóa Þórsdóttir, the former Minister of Education and Children's Minister, could be the meeting.

Need not be a confidence failure

The sender was a former mother -in -law man who had a child with Ásthildur Lóa Þórsdóttir when he was childhood. It is uncertain whether she knew that by authorizing Ásthildur Lóa to attend the meeting, she was at the same time allowing to distinguish her name.

« If I understand this correctly, then the Minister of Education and Children's Affairs did not know the assignment when the sender's name was stated. Eva.

Gray area

According to her, it is a key issue in the case whether the former mother -in -law knew that her name would be given to Ásthildur Lóa.

« What is in the gray area and may not have been clearly stated is whether the Prime Minister's action to give the name is a breach of confidentiality.

« So another matter is whether the sender was aware that by saying that it was okay for the Minister of Education and Children's Affairs to attend the meeting, he was also accepting that the name would be given to the Minister of Education and Children's Affairs.