Defeat for Prince Harry in Process for Police Protection – Diepresse.com
Harry has not been able to enjoy police protection for Königshaus members since its move to the USA. His « resentment » is not a sufficient legal argument, said the presiding judge.
In the dispute over the police protection for Prince Harry during stays in his home country, the son of the British King Charles III. have to take another legal defeat. Prince Harry’s « Groll » about the recalculation of the government’s protection measures is not a sufficient « legal argument » to act against this decision, the presiding judge at the London Court of Appeal judged on Friday.
The arguments of the younger son of King Charles III. be both powerful and moving, said the judge. The feeling of the disadvantage cannot be converted into a legal argument to contest the decision.
The British Ministry of the Interior, after its withdrawal, had withdrawn from his royal duties and its move to the United States in 2020 the fundamental police protection for members of the royal family at the expense of taxpayers. Instead, there has been « adapted » protection for the 40-year-old from case to case for the 40-year visits.
Lawyers argued with al-Qaida call to murder of Harry
The Ministry had asserted that Harry received tailor -made precautions. « It is important to emphasize that the decision was not that security measures, as they have existed so far, are no longer offered under any circumstances, » said a lawyer. Rather, it was about the fact that the security measures were no longer granted on the same basis because Harry’s status has changed and he would spend most of his time abroad.
In contrast, Harry was legal: the prince insisted on comprehensive and constant protection during visits to his home country, as is common for active royals. Harry’s lawyer had accused the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures that his decision to grant Harry had made less protection based on an inadequate security analysis. As a result, Harry’s children in Great Britain are not adequately protected. One argument was that al-Qaida called for Harry’s murder.
Harry and his wife, the former US actress Meghan Markle, had withdrawn from their royal duties in a dispute with the royal family in 2020. They live with their children Archie and Lilibet in Meghan’s home of California. The couple rarely come to Great Britain. The relationship with the royal family, especially Harry’s older brother, Crown Prince William, is considered broken. (APA/AFP)
