Column | Quality media are allowed to serve our show politicians a little less dedicated

You just have to dare. Now that the sacrifice party is, your entire comedy show devoted to ritual slaughter. I’m not talking about Wilders and his coalition, but about Lubach. During his episode about ritual slaughter I couldn’t get rid of me. The killing of animals, ritual or not, lends itself bad to humor. Apparently Lubach thought the subject was more important than his viewing figures. Not Wilders, who sacrifices the national administration for viewing figures. At his show, by the way, I had to laugh, especially when Yesilgöz did not dare to answer whether the VVD would rule with Wilders. She thought it was too early for that.

Extinction rebellion protested at the Mediapark. They wanted NOS to become more fair in her word choices. Do not say climate change, but climate crisis and talking about it more often. That same week I heard the presenter of News hour describe the BBB as “The party that wants to protect the farmers« To my knowledge, BBB is the party that keeps farmers in trouble for longer. Who mainly gives a big herd. Not necessarily for farmers. That word of words of News hour Could indeed be better. The same applies to the PVV as describing ‘party’. It is ‘Wilders’, not ‘the PVV’. Calling things by the name – I don’t think it’s strange that Extinction Rebellion asks. Unfortunate timed, though. The entire programming has been changed in crisis position for the time being. For days we will hear how a coalition that did nothing, now nothing will continue to do, but then outgoing. In national media it is treated as a crisis, but it is a change.

Asylum migration, by 11 percent A small part of the migration has been given the media attention for years that every top crisis would lick the fingers. The fact that some parties and Wilders have an interest in portraying asylum seekers as a big threat is a Sleetse trick that adult media should no longer be bored with. Nitrogen, housing shortage and the climate crisis are much greater threats. Even steel snails, vapes and PFAS can have asylum migration. Quality media can serve our show politicians a little less committed to making their fake reality. Then middle parties do not always have to fake that they are also very hard against asylum migration and I too can deal with more important topics. Ritual slaughter, for example.

Around the sacrificial festival, animal eaters that supposedly slaughter animals are going to finger finger to people who let it do that unexpectedly. For chickens, the ‘stunned’ slaughter means that they are gassed or electrocuted before being beheaded. Gassing and electrocuteing happens unannominated. Unsempty slaughtered cows are driven into a box for ‘anesthesia’ where they are popped for the fear of the head.

Animal eaters who excite over ritual slaughter sound like people who mistreat their children, numb them beforehand and finger them to parents who beat their children unnecessarily. « That is mistreatment! » And: « Yes, you can also stop mistreating, but vegan is stupid and who doesn’t want such a snot nose now and then to show all the corners of the room? Save is just tasty. Eh, meat. »

In a country where comedy shows are considering things of life and death and neutral news media take over terms from partisan script writers, it is logical that people believe that you can be against animal abuse while having animals, ritual or not, having them diverted for snacks. Consultants are those who dreams of a Netherlands where the climate crisis has its own journal, killing animals is forbidden and outgoing coalition partners only get attention if they beg for it in the parking lot of the Mediapark.

Carolina Trujillo Is a writer.

To share

Mail the editors