Case Sound Top: Should the FBI and FSB investigation collate the sovereignty of Serbia? – Politics

Our interlocutors are divided when it comes to collapse of sovereignty in an investigation that would lead foreign security organizations in Serbia.

Victim of Government Aleksandar Vulin and Foreign Minister Marko Đurić are the last in a series of Serbian officials who announced the arrival of the Russian FSB and the American FBI.

Vulin on Wednesday on RTS, he expected that the Russian FSB will soon send his delegation of experts and will come out with a clear attitude whether Sonic Weapons were used on the Student Presta in Belgrade. « I don’t know that the government has ever been so transparent that she said: Come and check it. I’m sure that the FSB will investigate that as soon as possible, » Vulin said.

Such announcements were produced in public with 1914. year, when the Kingdom of Serbia declined the ultimatum of the Austro-Hungarian and the request for their bodies to investigate in Serbia on the occasion of Franc Ferdinand’s killing.

Ljušić: Serbia used to risk the war due to the protection of sovereignty

Radoš LjušićThe historian and the professor at the Faculty of Philosophy, states that Serbia was 1914. defended its sovereignty and thus exhibited great danger to war with one great world force, but that today the image is completely different.

However, notes that Serbia is not a sovereign state since 1999. years.

« Since Serbia, a large part of the territory has never returned to the boundaries of a normal European state that can guarantee sovereignty with its citizens, » he states.

He says that he should keep in mind that Austro-Hungarian puts Serbia before a big problem, and that is to allow Serbia to examine whether the state bodies of the Kingdom are involved in the Sarajevo assassination.

« And that, of course, the ultimatum sent Serbia. Serbia responded, and two requests defended its sovereignty that he entered a great danger. Today we have a completely different situation, » says.

The situation is different because he says, the government now calls great powers to examine some things that Serbia can do it itself. « The question is whether we want to do it, » Ljušic said, and notes that this announcement considers « one big nonsense ».

He notes that each state has its own security that is obliged to take care of his country and on his people.

« That state that is unable to take care of their country, and he calls other fact that this state is extremely capable – it is able to follow every citizen. Accordingly, state security in us knows and not need any help, » no help is needed. « Specifies.

Ljušić says what happened at the protest 15. Marta in Belgrade is something that deserves every kind of condemnation and something that is very easy to prove – « that it has not come from Mars but can also be from the Albania’s Palace ».

« We don’t need a Russian or US intelligence service to determine what happened on Saturday, when he was the largest protest of the citizens of Belgrade. The authority sees help with an alibi to take responsibility, » said.

Kovač: Bad image is sent, problem of Serbian institutions

The Mitro Kovač is primarily a problematic poor image sent by such a call of FSB and FBI, because, he is stated, in an indirectly admits that the orders of the competent institutions of Serbia will not be appreciated here.

« Against such light resorts for foreign institutions, in many other areas, we also invite some foreigners, the sake of delivering and non-confidence in their people, which is a member of the Parliamentary Safety and Internal Affairs Committee in front of »We – a voice from the people« .

The general believes that the government decided on this call to make it easier to accept some more realistic information about alleged use sound cannon.

« Personally I am not constituted and engaged in the institutions, any EU institutions, that they can induce this day, which is to hire these institutions, which is due to the social crisis for several months and to be easier to accept the fact that would be They announced these, as, relatively independent institutions from abroad, « says Kovac.

Such a call also says the problem of institutions in Serbia, and adds that any mixing institutions for which there are paid competent domestic institutions reduces the capacity of the state and its sovereignty, but, on the other hand, that Serbia will not be completely collapsed.

« That is, it is an indirect recognition that we do not have relevant institutions. And I really think we also need to call them strangers while we still have our credible institutions, » he points out.

The blacksmith states and depends on the will of the FSB and FBI whether, for political or other reasons, they want to participate in being some kind of mediator who will place credible information.

« No visible traces remain after use of such funds, except for shots from the manifestations that occurred on the spot. The question of the relationship of these institutions – whether they can give an objective and relevant finding, » indicating.

Stojanovic: Concealance of the obligation to the European Court of Human Rights

Maja Stojanović, executive director of civil initiatives, it is possible that the announcement of the involvement of FSB and FBI in the investigation of the authority is a way to conceal the information to respond to the European Court of Human Rights on the useful use of Sonic Weapons. These are the civil sector organizations from the European Court from Serbia, including civil initiatives, and the response deadline is 31. March.

« The authorities are in the interests to make noise and create a fog around all the obligations of state institutions. However, the propaganda machine used within Serbia does not anneal to the state of this Court, » she says.

Stojanovic says that FSB and FBI have time and the competencies to deal with this issue, and if the invitation was really sent to these agencies, it is considered, only another way of political manipulation of public opinion.

« Our institutions, if they worked their job and if they would not be politically controlled, they would have the capacity to perform this type of investigation, » he stated. If domestic institutions do not do this, it only represents another proof that they are under the control of the government, Stojanović concludes.