Cancellation of cancellations

Canceling the cancellation of the people’s cancellations! This is how this Hazos Blitzkrieg on Friday could be called more synthetically. I am not referring to the decision to cancel the « fund » from Ploiești, but to the speed at which all procedural practices (former or valid) were violated from all the codes from Hammurabi.

The rule of law, also said our state with democratic ambitions, gave the pen faster and more careless than the slaughterhouse in the spine of the pig. She hurried as if she was afraid that a mouse was going to enter the computer in an atomic power plant and throws it. The truth that the whole mechanism of power, the tacit understanding of forces-institutions-party became unitary in interest, ie PSD-PNL-UDMR-CCR-ICCJ, massively supported by better and worse televisions, has been mobilized as a alarm per unit and, in a few hours, in the style of Ceac-Pac,
The decision from Ploiești. As if another republic, other than the life and work of Caragiale, could have been born to remove them from power. In the matter of speed and incorporation, the cancellation of Friday exceeds even the Ceausescu spouses.

Everything happened at the minute. Challenged, judged, determined, drafted.
Definitive!
I quote from a service body of the Romanian-European democracy on the net:

« Admits the appeals declared by the appellant-defendant Court
Constitutional of Romania and the appellant the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the Ploieşti Court of Appeal against Sentence no. 135 of April 24, 2025 pronounced by the Ploieşti Court of Appeal – Administrative and Fiscal Contentious Section. He tips in all the sentence appealed and re -judging: he admits the exception of the general incompetence of the courts. Rejects the requests for suspension, respectively annulment of the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Romania no. 32 of December 6, 2024,
formulated by the applicant Popescu Gheorghiţa, as inadmissible.
Definitive. ”

Assum, the « postmen » fled to Mrs. Gheorghița P. to stick to the door before she returned from the court, from the courtroom in which Judge Alexandru Vasile judged and drafted the minute and then the decision.

And what « enormities » did Judge Alexandru Vasile consider in motivating his decision at the action of the applicant Popescu Gheorghița?

« The applicant argues that, indirectly and illegally, by the RCC Decision no. final decision, being mocked, harassing and humiliated, as people who do not deserve to exercise their right to vote.  » Therefore, it shows the applicant that not only was it restricted, and to the other citizens with voting rights, the fundamental right to choose one of the two candidates validated by the CCR Decision no. 31 of December 2, 2024, by the illegal decision of the RCC and not by law, but practically this right has permanently annulled for the presidential elections ”.

In order to justify his decision, the judge took over the applicant’s argument:

« It shows the applicant that not any such fraud can lead to the cancellation of the elections, but only massive fraud, which can modify the order of the candidates for the second round.
The correctness of the electoral process in the first round was investigated by the Constitutional Court on the occasion of examining a appeal requesting the annulment of the elections in tour I. Thus, by Decision no. 30 of December 2, 2024 regarding the request to cancel the elections, made by Mr. Cristian Vasile Terheş,
The Constitutional Court held that neither the central electoral bureau nor the other electoral offices identified elements that can lead to the retention of the existence of some irregularities that affect the numerical result and that, as regards the way of the election campaign in the pre -Ect. to his vote in the online environment or at the vote exercised by voters who did not have the right to vote on additional lists because they had their domicile in the same administrative-territorial unit in which the polling station they voted was, these aspects were not motivated by the author of the request and obviously not proved. « 

What’s these? Truths easy to prove or enormities formulated by a dissatisfied?
Judge with law and experience studies, although not yet missed by such a case, the author of the Ploiești Court of Appeal, Alexandru Vasile, could not ignore the applicant’s argument. He even reproduced much of it. Her arguments, in the view of the world, helped him to design an unequivocal decision.

At the end of his decision he concluded:
« Admits the action for annulment formulated by the applicant Popescu Gheorghiţa, with his domicile (…) in contradiction with the defendant Constitutional Court of Romania, with headquarters in Bucharest, Calea 13 September, no.
to the applicant in the amount of 70 lei, representing judicial stamp duty.
With the right of appeal within 5 days from the ruling. Request for appeal is submitted to the Ploieşti Court of Appeal ”.

Good people! Didn’t you understand?

« The Constitutional Court of Romania, as a guarantor of the supremacy of the Constitution, appealed against the sentence given on April 24, 2025 by the Ploiești Court of Appeal, the administrative and fiscal litigation section. »

The requests made by Gheorghița Popescu were « rejected as inadmissible.

Clear?

Not who somehow the hell to make your illusions and go out on the streets!
As in the first republic in Ploiesti, as you say fish, to solve. Just as in a seminar room of the law of law in Mizil, where the students pretended to repeat a political comedy and finished in a hurry, to be able to delete it with the assistant. Not who somehow see and catch the teacher!
Otherwise, no, you can’t!

Post scriptum:

Anyone who says and asks for explanations, who challenges or laughs with his mouth is passed on the list of Cătălin Predoiu and has to expect not to an enrollment invitation, but to the gendarmes raven to six in the morning in the door of his house and to questions like questions
-What do you need, me?