But what kind of people are? | Opinion
Those of The triplet Ábalos-Koldo-Cardán, What kind of people do we think they are? What happened to them from their heads? Did they believe immune? Only that feeling of impunity would explain their negatives of corruption, knowing that they knew they were (say, allegedly) in handling. Did they ignore the evidence? And what one recorded them hidden?
They forgot something basic: who can the most (distract public resources) can at least (betray the private accomplice). Was there obsession with enriching itself? Or explained it by party service? Or for transfers to black financing? We will know. Were they aware of betraying the intimate president? Did they believe that he would never attest to the indications? Did they calculate that I would like, or could, yield to blackmail?
The triplet looks like style. With nuances, parco in Cerdán, hypertrophied in others. Agrees with the worst right: that « I am in the policy to line up » of The friends of Eduardo Zaplana; that shame of « Luis Be strong » sent to Bárcenas by Mariano Rajoy… but to a different degree. It is a less scented mode, of zafios knots of tie, of wrinkled costumes of clothing, never well cut in the street of Serrano.
Vulgar in their voracity ramplona of the « peaks » to distribute (« I only know that I do not have a hard fucking », « it already has me to the cock ») and in the climate of omertà (« that I don’t want you to talk about this, that is not spoken ”). Also with women: ex and the pos. Reified in subjects of use and payment objects. On account of the treasury. It overflows patriarchal machismo.
That appearance differential with high criminals standing Chirría. Is the type of social elevator used, to the menestral or humble origin? It is a triplet of Julianes Soreles Stendhalians with few PPO courses: bodyguard chopped in chóferes, maintenance technicians promoted to organizational guardians, local police councilors … perhaps, from classroom class. But the essential is not that, but the way of access to power. This progression is splashed with internal kitchen charges, APPARATCHIK: barely validated for some concurrence to elections, never transparent to the spotlights. Opaque.
Why does a triplet thus accompany the socialist leader heterodox since 2017? Pedro Sánchez then aspired to Secretary General of the PSOE. Extramuros of the elites of the party. He turned to the only available troop: some, dissatisfied; Others, Arribistas; The others, dark. This profile collapses with a crash. Replacing it is the first provision, among many, All urgent.
Huge task Because his good judgment has also been questioned when selecting and prosecuting paintings; because that error is cumulative; Because we do not know if it obeys ontological roots or a complete, radical and convincing rectification forth. Because we know the rejectable. But we hope, among doubts, the desirable. Everything hurts.
