Ayuso’s couple is disconnected from their lawyer to the Prosecutor’s Office in which he admitted two fiscal crimes | Spain

The businessman Alberto González Amador, a partner of Isabel Díaz Ayuso and charged with fiscal fraud, corruption in business and unfair administration, has been disconnected this Friday in the Supreme Court of the email sent on February 2, 2024 by his lawyer to the Prosecutor’s Office and for whose filtration the State Attorney General is investigated. González Amador, who He has declared a witness in the open cause for revelation of secrets against Álvaro García OrtizHe said that he asked the lawyer Carlos Neira for a discreet solution for his problems with the Treasury and that he did not give the consent to the lawyer to write or send that email, in which he admitted that his client had committed two crimes and proposed a pact that would fib them from the jail.

González Amador has testified at the request of García Ortiz and by order of the appeal room, which corrected Hurtado’s decision not to cite the entrepreneur. Ayuso’s couple has reached the Supreme Court at 10.00, 30 minutes before the time scheduled for their statement. He has arrived by car, accompanied by his lawyer, and has entered the court headquarters without making statements. Nor has he done them at the exit, after testifying before the judge for about an hour and a quarter.

The State Advocacy, which defends the Attorney General, claimed González Amador’s testimony to ask him about the management he made of the mail sent by his lawyer to the Prosecutor’s Office in which he admitted his crimes. But research sources point out that Ayuso’s couple has unmarked from that mail and has assured that he had no knowledge of him until March 14, the day he appeared published in many media.

González Amador has affirmed that, after learning that the Prosecutor’s Office investigated him, he put himself in the hands of the lawyer Neira and asked him to look for the exit that causes « less noise » to « not harm » his partner, they point out sources of the case. The businessman wanted to disconnect himself from the admission of the crime that his lawyer presented in the mail Sent to the Prosecutor’s Office (« certain fiscal crimes have certainly been committed ») and has tried to show that he has denied twice before the Treasury to have disappointed the treasury and did not agree with this lawyer’s decision. Despite this, he has assured that he continues to maintain the « trust » in Neira, to which the magistrate Hurtado has summoned to declare as a witness on May 27.

The businessman, according to the sources consulted, has implied that he learned that his lawyer admitted the crimes on the night of March 13, 2024 through the chain SER, which was the first medium that referred to the email sent by Neira to the Prosecutor’s Office and its content. However, in the investigation that is followed in the Supreme Court there is proof that González Amador did know that his lawyer was negotiating a pact with the Prosecutor’s Office. This was tested in the messages that the Chief of Cabinet of Ayuso, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez, who included WhatsApps From the lawyer to González Amador and that he forwarded to Rodríguez.

González Amador received a message from Neira on the morning of March 12 and forwarded it at 9.09 to Rodríguez: « Good morning Alberto. I have received a prosecutor’s mail. It seems that everything is still standing. I will call the prosecutor to concretize. The idea of ​​mine is that the end is only a minimum conviction and fine. » Then, González Amador also forwards Rodríguez the screening that Neira has happened to him mail received by the prosecutor that morning at 8.50:

“Good morning, Mr. Carlos (Neira, González Amador’s lawyer) I attach a copy of the complaint filed on March 5, 2024 against the Maxwell Cremona company to facilitate the right of defense. I suppose that up to two months we will not have the court in charge of the matter. Although it has also denounced other people, it will not be an obstacle to reach an agreement if you and your client estimate it possible. Prosecutor of the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Madrid ”.

However, according to sources in the case, the employer has defended that in these messages there was no talk of any pact or the admission of a fiscal fraud for his part. The state lawyer, according to the sources consulted, has then asked what the expressions « a convicted », « minimum fine » and « everything is still standing. » And González Amador, according to the sources, has « babbled. »