Applicants for law should adopt a 200-page statement in three days
Main tests|Applicants are waiting for the upcoming test day with conflicting feelings, although the aim of the reforms has been to reduce the workload.
The abstract is made by artificial intelligence and checked by man.
Universities’ entrance examinations were significantly renewed this spring.
Law applicants must adopt 200-page pre-material in just three days before the exam.
The short preparation time is part of the reform that aims to reduce the workload of applicants.
Some applicants consider the reforms a good thing. Some think that long material favors those who already have previous information about the industry.
To university Those who want to study law had an exciting situation on Monday when the pre -test was published.
What made the situation even more exciting was that the pre-material was revealed to almost 200 pages statementwho must adopt in three days. The test day is already on Thursday.
Short preparation time is part of universities the magnitude of the entrance examinationsthe aim of which is to reduce the workload of applicants by reducing pre -materials.
To law For those seeking, long pre -material came as a surprise.
« It is clear that no one can learn from the outside 200 pages in three days, » sums up Tatu Tukiainen his thoughts.
For the first time, he is applying for law.
Tukiainen was surprised by the length of the pre -material, but is generally positive about experimental reforms.
« I think this is equal to the exam, because for example, not everyone has the opportunity to clear so much time for reading, » he says.
“Experience will surely increase stress for those applicants who have applied for the previous exam several times,” says Tukiainen.
Also Enni-Mari Juntunen Applicants for the first time.
« A quick schedule will certainly cut the standards compared to previous years. This feels like a sprint instead of a marathon where the tuning day may be highlighted, » he ponders.
Juntus is wondering how to create challenges in the exam and how good the success in the exam is ultimately enough. However, previous university studies may help him.
« The experiment feels more to be achieved for myself, because this does not have to know theory in the field so much compared to, for example, science. For example, if there was a month to read, then things should be remembered in detail, » Juntunen says.
Milja In Uusitalo In turn, there is already one search, and for him, the reforms seem unrealistic.
According to Uusitalo, the decisive thing is how well the preparation time and long pre -material are taken into account in the test.
« Here we went from one end to another when the month’s preparation time was changed to three days. It discriminates against those who have reading difficulties, » Uusitalo says.
He says he has taken a month’s reading holiday, which, however, is not possible for all applicants.
« Before publishing the pre -material, he only hoped he had studied the right things. If the goal of the reforms was to reduce the load, it was not fully fulfilled for myself. »
For the test Preparation is different this year, as the content of the exam cannot be compared to previous years.
According to Uusitalo, the reforms have not reached the things that were promised.
« The selection of certificates has not yet been changed and the long matches are still emphasized. Long pre -material favors those who have a great deal of pre -knowledge of law. How could a student applying directly from a high school in three days? » Uusitalo says.
« I hope that after the exams, we are critical to see if the reforms really achieved the goals, » he sums up.
