Answer to submitter. Open up the Privacy Act to stop assistance cheating

That was the need for care Sweden would come from when the assistance reform came in 1994. Therefore, all institutions were demolished, because we killed people.

People with personal assistance need extended arms and legs to live a life like others in society on equal terms. Most who are in need of personal assistance can think for themselves. Form a family, vote in elections, have a job to go and more.

As a former authorities, I get goose bumps when I hear the word care. Should we see personal assistance as a right or cost. Personal assistance is not a privilege. It is a right. And it must continue to be.

All cheat is to be stigged in society and there may Håkan Ekblom have a point. But stop using the word « care »! When it comes to our courts, I think they have done an abusive job to safeguard the rights of the individual in society.

Just look at all the precedent judgments from the judiciary that have swept as a hail in Sweden. People have gotten rid of their personal assistance or have hours reduced. Is it the cheat that has colored our board members and women and society must tell some citizens that you have the right to take care of your stomach for two minutes on the toilet, dry time for a minute and more?

Something is bleeding in Swedish welfare, and if we are to access crime and people who are doing welfare, we need to open up the Privacy Act. Let different authorities cooperate! This may include, for example, moving from Sweden and continuing and receiving different social benefits.

Finally, for example, Sweden has decided that one cannot receive a guarantee pension If you have chosen to live in another country. Then you have to seek similar support in the country where you live.

More about submitter: How do you write on submitter and answer

More submissions: dn.se/insandare