Answer to submitter. Old Slussen favored the car, not the city

« Slussen (myth) is dead, long live Slussen (myth) »

Emergency savings on a well -known quote from the comic book Phantom, but the comparison is relevant. The Phantom/Slussen myth lives on, regardless of who wears the mask.

IN the submitter of architect Johannes Norlinder Supplied a familiar ointment of upset indignation based on, just that, the myth of phantom … Excuse me, the lock.

Of course there is Relevant views to present on the chosen architecture and the solution at large, although it is actually our elected officials who, on our assignment, have the ultimate responsibility.

For those who are outside the processes of public administration and democratically defined regulations, it may seem incomprehensible and undemocratic, but the result is actually the outcome that we have a democratically functioning process, where everyone may have an opinion but where the majority eventually decides.

So we do in Sweden and this also applies to Slussen. If you want to bring about a change, you have to get involved politically.

Regarding the Gold Bridge And the other outrageous details obey the writer elegantly to tell readers about what it looked like in the past when Slussen was the paradise of motoring; Yes, it was constructed at another time when the car was salvation on everything. The so -called consistent architecture favored the car, not the city.

Concrete desert, highway intersection and blue holes; The epithet is many, but urban building is not a static art and will always be the subject of criticism.

For those who want to know more about what applies, a visit to the Stockholm City Slussen exhibition is recommended, just that, Slussen. The City of Stockholm exemplarily offers an objective, factual and factually correct picture of the Slussen project from Anno Dazumal to 2025.

More about submitter: How do you write on submitter and answer

More submissions: dn.se/insandare