avril 19, 2025
Home » Another good days for the « independent » judiciary in Bulgaria

Another good days for the « independent » judiciary in Bulgaria

Another good days for the « independent » judiciary in Bulgaria


It is a note that one of the Bulgarian prosecutor’s office is talking. The environment of addictions in this Bulgarian institution is as high as it may never have been, writes the Institute for Market Economics In a comment on the events Around the Bulgarian European Prosecutor Teodora Georgieva, who « Dnevnik » published.

Fact chronology:

  • Public announcement on 28.02.2025 in an interview with Capital – European prosecutor Teodora Georgieva states that « public procurement has been a worked scheme for draining funds » and employees of the Ministry of Interior are sabotaging investigations. Among these cases is the purchase of trolleybuses from Belarus by the Municipality of Vratsa, declared as Polish. The same company that supplied the trolls has contracts with the Ministry of Interior for over BGN 10 million. Officers delay a search for a week, despite the court permission for this procedural action. The second case is the search at Bulgartransgaz for the extension of the gas storage in ChirenS The delay is nearly 10 days, again due to the Ministry of the Interior – this time to the National Police Directorate, led by Atanas Ilkov. Ilkov then became a minister in place of Kalin Stoyanov. Kalin Stoyanov is a member of Peevski’s MRF. The third action is for some BGN 300 million, pre -trial proceedings on NRIC activities – there are contracts with hollow companies against this money. Draws at the cashier are BGN 10 million – which is very reminiscent of those BGN 60 million also withdrawn at the construction cashier of Hemus HighwayS
  • On March 10th a video is distributedwhich shows a person who looks like Pepi the euro and a figure in the back, which is said to be by Theodora Georgieva. The video is accompanied by a letter signed by Pepi the euro.
  • On March 12, the Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office ordered an inspection of Teodora Georgieva about her relations with Pepi the euro, and a check was also awarded to the Commission for Combating Corruption.
  • On March 26, the European Prosecutor’s Office (EP) inform that Administrative verification beginsS There is no specificity of the subject of the inspection, but the aim is to establish whether the independence of a European prosecutor in Bulgaria is affected.
  • On March 27 Teodora Georgieva announcesthat she was subject to inspection by the European Prosecutor’s Office regarding her dismissal regarding the investigation of the Cyren gas storage facility, as she was threatened: « In connection with the threats I made, I would like to clarify that I did a person on the occasion of the Cire, because I feel threatened by Mr. Peevski, To upload the margin of the profit of the contractor and to implement the project at an unbearably low prices for them. « 
The threat is precisely that records and compromises at her address will be distributed. It is here that it is evident how important it is to know where the archive with the compromises of Pepi the euro is, because it is obviously used for coercion against judges, prosecutors and investigators. On the same day, Peevski denied by accusing Georgieva in Ortaklak with the euro. The facts show that Peevski The investigation was Peter Petrov-Euro.
  • On March 27 also Theodora Georgieva is temporarily removed From office, in order not to compromise the investigation against her – this instrument is well known both in the Bulgarian criminal process and in the disciplinary proceedings under the Bulgarian dishwasher, as well as the regulation on the structure and activities of the European Prosecutor’s Office. Removal aims at the person who is investigated not to prevent his actions of establishing precisely the facts, and not to be influenced by the institution itself.

Who and why sends a video from the Cabinet of the Petio Euro at the Eight Dwarves Restaurant

The possible actions

First of all, it is to note that one of the Bulgarian prosecutor’s office is talking. The environment of addictions in this Bulgarian institution is as high as it may have never been. Appointments and promotions are based in whole or on kinship or political and economic dependencies. Exceptions illustrate and confirm the rule.

It is a system of kinship, tablecloths, blankets and ruins. And the provisions of the Judiciary Act and the hollow expensive officials at the Prosecutorial Board of the Judicial Council are Mimans for Brussels and the media.

It is in this environment that it is good to know that the conquered Bulgarian institutions and the media environment will turn everything against Theodora Georgieva. And everyone speaking will be mercilessly persecuted. From now on, rotten people and organs will wave the bat in several possible directions:

– check by the prosecutor’s office itself with a scaled accusation for the purposes of revenge and pressure. This is an interior specialty. You will find someone to do it, why and how. We remember the case of Judge Miroslav Petrovwhere his colleague from the Sofia District Prosecutor’s Office tried to appear a control and award court above the judge himself, and hence over the court as an institution.

– inspection from the Inspectorate to the Supreme Judicial Council (ICJC) For the work of Teodora Georgieva as a regular Bulgarian prosecutor – this check is also a reason for disciplinary proceedings – the inspectorate in this composition is a convenient gadget of political power and punishes whom it does not need and washed, which it should not.

A new recording from the Cabinet of Petio Petrov-Euro in « The Eight Dwarves »

What has not been done here

– We are witnessing the complete and characteristic silence of the prosecutor’s office in the investigation, both for the murder and the activities of Martin Bozhanov-Notarus and for Pepi the euro. The lack of unraveling who is behind the eight dwarves allows Borislav Sarafov to be temporarily performing the Attorney General instead of questioned in the case. It should not be that both dispatchers of influence in the judiciary have the same patron and lead to the same hotel named « Berlin ».

Teodora Georgieva has announced that she has been investigated for her detection of the Chiren case, not the records

– There is complete silence and by calling to defend the independence of the judiciary of the Supreme Judicial Council. The absurdity of this silence is supplemented by the prosecutors’ tied to a strap and the prosecutor’s college itself. Otherwise, the noisy of how independent the Bulgarian prosecutor’s office should be now silent, because it may be good to be independent of an external look and accountability, but it lives well for the real ruling and for many of the workers in it;

The search of Pepi the euro from the Ministry of Interior is like a farce – For more than two years, they have been looking for it, but they do not find it, the likelihood of living in Bulgaria, and from time to time it jumps to Greece is not small, only the Ministry of Interior did not understand this.

– there is no analysis and reaction from the SJC for the deals – in Bulgaria the judges are taken massively, entire courts do not want to hear cases, the prosecutor’s office is the same, the review and reaction of the majority of the Judicial Council on the topic. In Europe, however, a dismissal means a problem that leads to either incompetence, that is, incompetence, or to addictions. We are different.

So far, it is important to know that whatever the people here, Teodora Georgieva does not automatically waste her status as a European prosecutor and will take time to immerse the case at the international level. Otherwise, he has already sunk in our country when he has begun.

Rumen Radev: Whether other representatives of the judiciary have not passed through the euro sofa

Rumen Radev: Whether other representatives of the judiciary have not passed through the euro sofa

The « Analysis » section presents different perspectives, it is not necessarily the expressed opinions that they coincide with the editorial position of Dnevnik.



View Original Source