Also in the coalition is paid transaction tax
Who does not want to pay it will not be in any coalition.
This will be on the battlefield of the transaction Taxes political infantilization. We will not forget that he started with that Andrej Dankowhen with his distinctive vocabulary and manner set off to fight with transactional tax. But the opposition challenges to cancel it with them are only a little worse.
Gašpar refuses that the coalition ceasefire lasts only two weeks Read
We have to believe that the opposition does not mean seriously and just tries to feed coalition disagreements and warm Dank’s heart, which is difficult to object to. However, the rest of us would not have to wrap our hands at the fact that Danko voted for something he doesn’t like, and at all that it would not disturb the opposition despite public criticism.
Conversely, reason should stop when he Michal Šimečka He gives an example of himself and freedom with what PS votes for proposals solely by content regardless of the petitioner. Šimečka certainly understands that the coalition party cannot act as opposition, because it would quickly become opposition.
And if he does not understand it, it can explain to him, perhaps Tomáš Valášek.
We have already said that the coalition is created by closing the comprehensive system of agreements. You let go of something to the other partner, something third to you and so on. Therefore, when one of these agreements stops paying, none pays and the association either collapses or reconstructs. We’ve seen it recently.
Valáško’s name was heard, because this PS MP in 2020 voted for the program statement, including the absurdities and outrageousness of the Rang of Elections via internetbanking.
At the same time, it is an educated to a sensible person who knew it was dangerous and if they really approved it by law, he would like to cancel it once. But while he was and wanted to remain a coalition deputy, he wouldn’t do it with the opposition. Because he did not fall from the cherry.
In the Slovak coalition contracts, since the 1990s, a formula on the ban on the promotion of its interests « at the expense of another coalition party has settled together with the opposition’s parties ». It is actually a tax on the coalition transaction.
It is an insurance against black passengers who would consume power thanks to coalition partners and still feed on the opposition table. It is hard to imagine the thicker this principle than with the opposition, the shot of Facka finance to the Minister of Finance.
It will still be necessary to explain to Danko that the ban, of course, and logically applies, regardless of whether he will submit the annulment of the transaction tax he or Šimečka, but ultimately understands it.
This does not mean that the transaction tax will survive without harm. Obviously, this is an unpleasant source of discord, but if Danko pushes some change, the opposition will only be useful by the fact that it will make it in the coalition. Otherwise it will not be in any. And he does not want this tax yet.
