After the eloquent trial and victim confrontation – lawyers’ counterattack

Changed in places

The aforementioned alive impairment of R. Sadauskas and eight accused persons from his bullshit incentives and a violation of public order occurred in Kaunas District Court on Thursday, where this resonant case is stuck since December 2023. It was only through it that R. Sadauskas was in the cage of the courtroom, and all the defendants are already in freedom.

Although the remote hearing of R. Sadauskas, as already written, has already taken place in this trial, after more than a year of law enforcement, Gytis Kukliauskas, who is hiding from law enforcement, and his case to be heard in court, Mr Kukliauskas requested an additional question from R. Sadauskas and another victim.

T. Petrošius, who, according to the portal kauno.dien.lt, has already been released from Alytus Prison, where he was more accurately released for a short -term weekend trip home, he then entered the creature of the events that suffered in this case, requested him to participate in this interrogation. R. Sadauskas, as already written, was arrested a couple of months ago for a very serious international crime – unlawful acquisition, possession and transportation and realization of very large quantities of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, and was brought to confrontation with his accused live.

The fact that the face of R. Sadauskas, who had been handcuffed and convoyed in the doorway in the doorway, was initially anxious. But only for a short time – when the opponents were seen, it turned on a regular cynical smile. It was with her that R. Sadauskas showed G. Kukliauskas from the court cage and obscene gestures. It is true that what the latter did at the time is unclear.

Rytis Sadauskas/Photo by Edgar Cickiewicz

The situation changed

After Judge Virginijus Kalkauskas, after the court of R. Sadauskas, the testimony given by R. Sadauskas – that he had never known any of the defendants and had never seen before, and he could not say anything about the incident that was recognized as a victim because he only remembers that he had lunch at the back of the Grint Cinnamome. Stated by doctors, he could have experienced in the morning before these events in the car door, and was given the word to G. Kukliauskas and his lawyer. The issues of R. Sadauskas asked the latter – whether he was authorized to have a weapon permit and whether there was a pre -trial investigation into the violation or use of this storage, to which Sadauskas answered positively, further strengthened one of the main versions, which then all happened.

And who then took about Abduction?!

As already written, according to the portal kauno. Diena.lt, a few days before this attack on the same Laisvės Alley, G. Kukliauskas’ spouse was threatened not to look for guilty of injury to their daughter in August 2018 because the family had not abandoned such plans. The little one suffered when a BMW X5 was shot when his father was driving downhill Street while driving downhill Street. It is only through a happy coincidence that she is only easily injured only in the foot. One of the versions is that the events of August 25th in Laisvės Alley are a continuation of a long-standing conflict related to the attack on Nuokalnės Street.

After giving Mr Kukliauskas the right to ask questions to R. Sadauskas, he started with: « Did you beat you in this hall? » And with a negative answer, he asked with a highly raised voice, « And then who took Abduction?! » If Sadauskas did not answer this question, other defendants began to express the same claims, before some of Sadauskas’ answers, laughing or replicating that he was talking nonsense.

One of the most active was Vitalijus Zakrževskis, who had a throat injury during the attack. According to the portal kauno.dien.lt, while law enforcementists are carefully studying slowly the attacks of the attack, it is recorded that when V. Zakrževskis allegedly attaches to R. Sadauskas, he performs a sudden movement by hand, after which V. Zakrževskis grabs his throat. It is suspected to have been injured with a knife or any other sharp object.

During the new confrontation between the two, R. Sadauskas, already in Kaunas District Court, to one of V. Zakrževskis, who was soothed by even other defendants, cut off that « there is a document and that you have a bee! ».

Mel’s legs are short

As the situation was healed, Judge V. Kalkauskas even warned the defendants that they would receive fines and would be removed from the courtroom.

T. Petrošius, who had the status of the victim in the case, also completed the answers to the defendants, who said he had lost the court at some point in Laisvės Alley, where he had come to his friend R. Sadauskas, as he promised to recruit him as a manager at the restaurant hospital.

After one of Zakrzhevsky’s question – basically about the same thing, why became the victim of this case, Petrošius then struck V. Zakrzhevski, who replicated: « Do you let me answer?! ». And when he said what he wanted, he finished in the same tone, « Obviously, isn’t it?! », What Mr Zakrzhevsky’s answer came to, « You can say so! ».

It remains to be recalled that the spouse of T. Petrosius, whose rare name is the same as the Lithuanian Mediator Mediator, who has a Master’s degree in Law and the Chief Specialist of Kaunas City Children’s Rights Protection Division, who is on calls, also lunch with the aforementioned victims at the same desk. And when she and her and the testimony of other witnesses gave to the court, it turned out that the spouse of T. Petrošius was pretending.

Tadas Petrošius/editorial arch. Photo by

She also said she didn’t really see what happened while waiting for a lunch account. He learned everything after that – from the media. And after that lunch, he first saw R. Sadauskas, who was as unsuccessful, with his passion, bloody in the mike and the clothes that were not before. And then took his car with his spouse, who was not injured, although Alytus Prison later provided law enforcement information about the injuries of T. Petrošius, R. Sadauskas to Kaunas clinics, although he did not see any injuries.

However, one of the medical practitioners who had given the help of the clinics in the clinics, however, said that he had been brought in pain, unknown persons, and left in the waiting room. And complained of headaches through the eyes of the warming, spraying the gas.

Best defense for attacking

As already written, according to the videos, the indictment of this case not only contains the actions of each participant, but also the weapons.

According to the indictment, Juozas Minkevičius, who, as a minor, was convicted of the maximum punishment of the offender for murder, and Karolis Kavaliauskas, as well as being a minor, convicted of robbery, was armed with castes. And K. Kavaliauskas still kicked R. Sadauskas and pounded his fists and threw the restaurant’s furniture. Edgar Rezayev, whose biography contains two convictions, last is related to the illegal hunting or fishing or fishing of extremely protected species, and Rokas Sipavičius, like G. Kukliauskas, then escaped with accomplices from the cross -shot armed with metal bars. The aforementioned V. Zakrževskis, convicted six times, the last one for rape in the accomplice group, had released his fists. Like the only successful potential participant in this attack, Dalius Dambrauskas is the only successful hiding. Lukas Ščerbinskas, who has been convicted of seven times (theft, extortion), as well as Tadas Mučinskas, has been convicted twice, the last one for theft, did not allow R. Sadauskas to escape, along with other accomplices surrounded by other accomplices.

Photo by reader, Justina Lasauskaitė

There is no imprisonment of up to five years’ imprisonment for a minor disruption of health, which is found to R. Sadauskas. And for a violation of public order, public works or fine, or restriction, or arrest, or imprisonment of up to two years.

However, after the survey of two of the four victims who caused a great deal of passion, lawyers also slipped into the fire. Even two of them submitted to the court the conclusions of the independent medical experts that R. Sadauskas had only been caused by a minor health impairment, because the finger fracture was caused by the expert of Kaunas branch of the State Forensic Medicine Service.

Now the queue for the media?

Although the prosecutor contradicted the attachment of the above conclusions to the case, after one of the lawyers’ argument that the court must assess and eliminate them, Judge Kalkauskas joined these conclusions to the case. And will invite an expert at the State Forensic Medical Service to another meeting to the interview, which signed the accusation and one of the independent experts who contradicted him, as the second died a couple of months ago.

If the court decides that Sadauskas had a minor health impairment, the Criminal Code provides for five times less than a minor health impairment, imprisonment for up to one year. Although the other three victims have a minor health impairment involved in the allegation of a public order offense, for which the maximum penalty is, as already mentioned, imprisonment for up to two years.

Who can deny that after such a lawyer counterattack, the defendants did not want to « place » and the media. One of them, at the end of the hearing, but before his participants, the author of this essay stated that she would no longer want to attend other meetings. And G. Kukliauskas also allowed himself a brief lecture about violations of the rights of the child, with his own offspring, and his father’s name in the context of the case. Although this is publicly announced, as are the other defendants, as this trial is public. Now that other classmates are mocking his child. That is, attempts were made to use the same tricks of defendants who are in their children and take pictures, somehow not thinking about their offspring in crime. Although, according to G. Kukliauskas, his child received bullying for the previous story, mentioned in the context of the case, the author of this claim somehow did not realize that his offspring’s fellow students may have responded to his involvement in such a major attack.