After the conviction of Marine Le Pen, the danger of anti-jugs poison-Liberation
The crazy media machine is launched at full speed, the logorrhea spreads, invades the waves, squats the screens, broadcasts a nauseating neo-Trumpian speech with the national rally sauce. A whirlwind of words without tail or head, the only goal of which is to drown the truth of the facts in an ocean of questionable declarations. At the RN, everything seemed to falter for a moment against the shock of the decision, as the far -right leader had refused to prepare the troops at the worst.
After this moment of error, very quickly, the response was organized and the elements of language were coordinated. By Marine Le Pen herself who, on TF1, pleaded « The administrative disagreement with the European Parliament » In defiance of the deliberation-guilty, should be remembered. Through his envoys in the hemicycle, Tuesday, April 1, during questions to the government, who continued to minimize, distort, questioning the work of justice, denouncing an alleged « system ». By its emissaries On the trays of the Bolloré sphere which shamelessly agitate the conspiracy concepts of deep state, shouting at the death of democracy. By all the anonymous people who, on social networks, threaten the three judges of the file, placed under police protection. By all those who stir up the idea of a pseudo « government of judges ».
Faced with his attacks, the Prime Minister, François Bayrou, and the Minister of Justice, Gérald Darmanin, said in the hemicycle their unconditional support for the judges. But evil is already done when Bayrou evokes « Questions » on the question of provisional execution, or expresses its « disorder »taking the risk of fueling doubt. There is no « trouble », There are accumulated evidence, pronounced penaltiesdesignated culprits. Marine Le Pen, like any citizen, was able to rely on the Court of Appeal which announced on Tuesday being able to « Make a decision in the summer of 2026 ». Until then, politicians have nothing to gain, whatever their edge, to maintain ambiguity on the independence of justice.
