A tenant living in 10 square meters without water, electricity and toilet got a dispute against Salihamidzic
Hasan Salihamidzic. The former sports director Bayern And the former BiH national team, faces legal problems in Germany. Namely, the Frankfurt Municipal Court ruled in favor of his tenant Jele Jeremicwhich sued him for inhumanes’ housing conditions during the renovation of the building in the Frankfurt Gallus district.
Jeremic, who has lived in a room of ten square meters in a building in Salihamidzic’s ownership for nine years, found herself in a difficult situation when extensive construction works began in the mid -2023. She claims that she was disabled access to the bathroom and the toilet on her floor because the common sanitary facilities were removed without consent to the works in her part of the facility. She was forced to use sanitary nodes on the third floor and in the basement, which was also used by construction workers.
In addition, the tenant complained about frequent electricity disappearances and reduced quality of life, and despite everything, she continued to pay a full rent of 360 euros a month. The court determined that this was a violation of the rental contract and ordered Salihamidzic’s management company Renditus to enable the use of the first floor bathroom, ensure a permanent supply supply and approve of renting a 50 percent until the conditions are normalized.
Court proceedings have caused great attention from German media, and the entrepreneur’s statement is especially observed Mustafa Tokgöza who emphasized in the media that the verdict clearly confirms the disruption of basic tenancy rights. Salihamidzic’s company tried to prevent a settlement from a settlement of 12,000 euros, which Jeremic rejected.
Renditus Director, Michael Schrammstated that he continued to believe that the tenant was responsible for escalating the dispute and that she was the only one who did not agree to the renovation conditions offered. He added that the company was considering filing an appeal against the verdict, which could mean a continuation of the dispute on a higher court instance.
