A new order without institutions
Any reasonable and common sense person was shocked by the moments lived in the White House Oval Room, between the US and Ukrainian presidents, especially when we realized that it was not a staging. After the clash, it is important to reflect on the ambush where Zelensky fell by extreme need and who served that disrespect. Contrary to what one might think, the world has not gone crazy and intention is transparent.
Trump is a arrogant calculator, striding to make Henry Kissinger's dream of a single superpower, while his manieted horde applauds his fanfare in ecstasy.
The signs were appearing from the beginning, with the rename of Mexico to Gronelândia, through the attempts to subversion and interference in democratic choices in various European countries, by themselves or their co -religionists, to the point of offending and humiliating in summits where they emerged as guests.
To achieve its ends, in a logic recovered from previous dominant views, it needs to close itself economically and to stop feeding others, forcing Europe to increase investments in the military field and later cornering Russia and China. With Israel as a preferred ally, the next step will be facing Iran, the real target of this accomplice, because Gaza was just a stone on this path.
On the other hand, in the face of spectators progressively contaminated by disbelief, this philosophy needs disrespect for the institutions, sentencing the end of the institutionalism that interests it so much, well characterized by Elon Musk of cap and jumps in the oval room. This legitimates the exclusion of the United Nations and the placement of Europe out of play both in Ukraine and the world.
Romanticism has ended and, in this new world order of competition with geostrategic interests facing its economies, could emerge the largest opportunity in Europe. But it is likely that it is not properly used.
In disturbed times, the new rules of global game required a strong and cohesive union in Europe, without their internal inconsistencies and total absence of a common agenda, prepared in advance to be competent to affirm us on the international stage as a unique power.
The excitement around the French President well demonstrates the screaming lack of leadership in Europe, widespread by member states unable to quit US dependence, with a politically weakened Germany. As we continue to speak to several voices, they enjoy.
If the European Union was created to harm the United States, as Trump states, we may think that it has emerged to change the world and this merit nobody takes it, no matter how much it costs. In the next few chapters, world peace and security can only appear by the capitulation of the weak, and Europe will remain absent from any relevant role.
