A complex man who woa a simple story
In a divided public opinion, it would be illusory to expect a lot of agreement with anything, especially on what is permanently caught up by eighty -eight -year -old men, who has once again brought him a four -year stay at the 1600 Penissal Avenue. Mass is massively surrendering to indifference and becoming the moves by which the White House residents break down the established procedures of international order as well as decent, some of the usual and unworthy special attention, it may be time to look at what way of speaking and thinking, and also how abused « healthy reason » we must, as diplomats and politicians, obviously get used to.
On the other side of the Atlantic, the « big, beautiful » sea, the anti -trumping intoned circles agree that now the decisions are ruled by Narcissus, or at least verbal daffodils, definitely a magnificent self -propagandist, pragmatist, as much as possible, a non -ensomen character, an extreme person who, fragments, parallelisms, repetitions. His sentences are filled with empty, at first glance superfluous adjectives, and his speaking often seems rather incoherent, without clear threads or arch, even before he is able to end one thought, surprise with a whole new one, with the third, fourth …
Some American linguists, who did not find it unnecessary to analyze the Trump talking style, said that the speaker brings benefits because at a time when public confidence in the politicians of all BAŽ folded, he paraded with the accent of the New York working layer. Despite millions of wallet, this approaches the electoral base in his wallet, as Manhattan American English is associated with competence, aggression and immediacy. The sentences in which Trump is in favor of, but are not a special wonder, is supposed to be politely by New Yorkers if you finish the sentence for him.
About his way of communication, Trump has been sovereignly sovereignly, as he knows, explained that he did not speak during public appearances, but who, « You know, with words. Do you know what weaving is? I may talk about nine different things, but in the end everything will be caught. This is some of the most brilliant, it is what my friends, English professors call me. » If I only read from Teleportter, I wouldn’t impress anyone. Speech should be collected. «
The structure of Trump’s speaking, his art of rhetoric is something special, most often uses short, simple telling sentences and constantly repeated, his dictionary is special. The diagnosis of one of the American researchers was relatively short: short sentences speak of the way Trump thinks, his speech reveals a person who cannot consider consideration of only one topic, a person who has no intellectual discipline and analytical skills, in short, a person who has problems with concentration. But as such, he is convincing enough for many, especially for their voters, for all those who are superfluous to any complexity, but prefer to see the world black and white and simply words. And Trump sells it to them, divided into good and bad, into people and elites – with whom they will have to be calculated.
Many things in Trump’s public statements and speeches are reminiscent of tricks of commercial passengers, many times anything unresponsive to do probably with a simple introduction « Many say … » or « believe me … ». His points are nothing weaker, although he fills them with prejudices, unresponsive facts and sometimes simple lies, with everything we usually refer to as a repertoire of demagog. Simplicity, slogans, repetitions, playing on the emotions of listeners, all of this is the essence of his speaking style. How old is his promise of the wall against Mexico? During the pre -election campaign, which eventually brought him to the White House, he said, « I’ll build a big wall – and believe me, no one builds walls better than me – and I will build it very cheap. » Why is the Atlantic Ocean « beautiful » sea? Maybe it’s because Greenland is somewhere there?
The pollutant of the discourse of international relations promised to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, much later offered an explanation: “Well, I was a little sarcastic when I said it. I really think I would like to settle this matter. » The opinion should be sent to prison. « These people are bad people, really bad people. »
The leader of the Maga cult, the solar king of Mar-a-adola, the imitation of Versailles, who, with his executive ordinances, almost royal decrees, changed American social and political norms in a few days and weeks, describes himself as a hero in speeches in which he mentions himself above average. He is convinced that he is the winner, the savior, the fighter against the criminals, the best from the one or that side of the border, and in appearances he never forgets in one way or another.
It is never possible to know final: He manages firefighting strategies and tactics, pricing policy for basic food goods, tariff policy, and he is not foreign to the knowledge of the work of air traffic controllers, as well as the inferiorism of paper straws, which he ordered to replace the federal institutions with plastic. He can also sovereignly offer new geographical names, obviously knows everything about organizing the World Cup in football and has therefore set himself as head of the preparatory work group, it seems that he has made a thick earnings by issuing a cryptocurrency, which he has labeled artistic work, and his immense talent for mastery of international relations.
He also finds himself well in the wider field of culture, otherwise he would probably not be able to set himself up for the new Kennedy Center president, probably under his wise leadership they will offer magnificent, never -known cultural content. However, it may not be far from the day when the presidential command from the oval office will command that the writer can only be the one who writes beautiful, short sentences, not tired of reading with complex subordinates. And the day when, on the other side of the Atlantic, they will have to consider whether, instead of Nobel Prize for Peace, they would better suit the literature.